| Revision as of 15:33, 29 October 2005 editImaglang (talk | contribs)2,300 edits →Statement by party 1← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:10, 4 November 2005 edit undoResearcher99 (talk | contribs)511 editsm →Statement by party 1: retitled as →Statement by AMA advocate of party 1: to make way for party 1's own Statement sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| * {{User|Nereocystis}} | * {{User|Nereocystis}} | ||
| ==Statement by party 1== | ==Statement by AMA advocate of party 1== | ||
| ''Statement by ] official ] advocate of ]'' (see ) | ''Statement by ] official ] advocate of ]'' (see ) | ||
| ] has been attacked constantly by ] in many polygamy related articles, but specially in ] and in ] with abusive behaivor including POV warring, unexplaine reversions and constant ''ad hominem'' attacks in his posts. Although all tries to solve the dispute through ] (started by the other party), ] (started by us), Nereocystis has shown no intention to solve the dispute in a civil manner, so we request this arbitration to stop this abuse against Researcher. --] 15:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | ] has been attacked constantly by ] in many polygamy related articles, but specially in ] and in ] with abusive behaivor including POV warring, unexplaine reversions and constant ''ad hominem'' attacks in his posts. Although all tries to solve the dispute through ] (started by the other party), ] (started by us), Nereocystis has shown no intention to solve the dispute in a civil manner, so we request this arbitration to stop this abuse against Researcher. --] 15:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Statement by party 1== | |||
| ==Statement by party 2== | ==Statement by party 2== | ||
Revision as of 19:10, 4 November 2005
Case Opened on 17:02, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
This case is a merger of "User:Researcher99 on the Polygamy and Group marriage pages" and "Abuses on Polygamy article", see Talk page for the original requests.
Please do not edit this page directly unless you wish to become a participant in this request. (All participants are subject to Arbitration Committee decisions, and the ArbCom will consider each participant's role in the dispute.) Comments are very welcome on the Talk page, and will be read, in full. Evidence, no matter who can provide it, is very welcome at /Evidence. Evidence is more useful than comments.
Arbitrators will be working on evidence and suggesting proposed decisions at /Workshop and voting on proposed decisions at /Proposed decision.
Involved parties
- Researcher99 (talk · contribs) (initiating party through official AMA advocate Imaglang (talk · contribs) aka Neigel von Teighen)
- Nereocystis (talk · contribs)
Statement by AMA advocate of party 1
Statement by Neigel von Teighen official AMA advocate of User:Researcher99 (see )
User:Researcher99 has been attacked constantly by User:Nereocystis in many polygamy related articles, but specially in Polygamy and in Talk:Polygamy with abusive behaivor including POV warring, unexplaine reversions and constant ad hominem attacks in his posts. Although all tries to solve the dispute through RfC (started by the other party), official mediation (started by us), Nereocystis has shown no intention to solve the dispute in a civil manner, so we request this arbitration to stop this abuse against Researcher. --Neigel von Teighen 15:33, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Statement by party 1
Statement by party 2
Please limit your statement to 500 words
Preliminary decisions
Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (4/0/0/0)
- Accept and merge Fred Bauder 21:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept. James F. (talk) 23:14, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept ➥the Epopt 04:06, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept and merge. Kelly Martin 15:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept and merge Fred Bauder 21:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept. James F. (talk) 23:12, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept ➥the Epopt 13:52, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- Accept and merge. Kelly Martin 15:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
Temporary injunction (none)
Final decision (none yet)
All numbering based on /Proposed decision (vote counts and comments are there as well)
Principles
Findings of Fact
Remedies
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.