| Revision as of 15:44, 5 November 2005 editDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 edits →Stop Reverting The [] Page!← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:02, 5 November 2005 edit undoDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 edits →Stop Reverting The [] Page! PART IINext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| <p> | <p> | ||
| One "book" waiting to be published (if such exists) is not a sufficient source when compared to Metal Archives, Allmusic.com, Ultimate Metal, etc, which are highly reputable in Metal music Circles. So far, the only person who seems to think otherwise is you. If an unpublished, untitled, and anonymous "book" is the best justification for your changes, then there's absolutely no question behind the reason ], ] and myself have conserved the original edit vs. yours. --] 14:40, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | One "book" waiting to be published (if such exists) is not a sufficient source when compared to Metal Archives, Allmusic.com, Ultimate Metal, etc, which are highly reputable in Metal music Circles. So far, the only person who seems to think otherwise is you. If an unpublished, untitled, and anonymous "book" is the best justification for your changes, then there's absolutely no question behind the reason ], ] and myself have conserved the original edit vs. yours. --] 14:40, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| <p> | |||
| == Stop Reverting The ] Page! PART III == | |||
| <p> | |||
| Everything that is provided to you that doesn't support your viewpoint seems to have been "discredited" (NO PROOF PROVIDED) and that there are supposedly other sources with more accurace information (as of now, NO PROOF PROVIDED of such). Essentially you're saying "we're wrong, the proof we're providing is wrong, yet there's no proof that this proof is wrong." Plus, you still have not provided clear and concide evidence for your version. --] 14:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:02, 5 November 2005
Welcome!
Hi Leyasu! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Idont Havaname 00:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Gothic metal
Before you make sweeping changes to this or any other page that has had some discussion, please ask at the corresponding talk page. It's a good way to avoid being reverted. Also, please read over some of our policies, such as WP:CIVIL and WP:NPOV; otherwise, you might not be able to work well with the other editors. --Idont Havaname 00:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
No personal attacks!
I've tried to be patient with you and would like to continue working with you to make Gothic metal a better article, but you're ignoring the rules of this site. Please stop making personal attacks, as you have done in your recent edit summaries. Please also read Misplaced Pages:Ownership of articles and the other pages I mentioned in my most recent message at Talk:Gothic metal. Also note that the three-revert rule states that any editor that reverts an article more than 3 times in a 24-hour period is subject to a temporary block. --Idont Havaname 06:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- The edit summary I was talking about was "Reverted back because children keep changing it without reading it - Sorry i meant Dante". Also, lording your expertise over other users is somewhat of a personal attack, because you're implying that you know more than the rest of us. (You seem like you do know a lot about the subject, but it's best to go by this advice and make sure you cite everything.) --Idont Havaname 06:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Stop Reverting The Gothic Metal Page!
Idont Havaname, Ray Dassen and myself have asked you a repeated number of times to cite sources. I have, yet you claim one to be discredited in books by gothic metal bands. (Allmusic.com). PROVIDE PROOF of this. You think Lacuna Coil are nu-metal band - PROVIDE PROOF. The longer this is drawn out the quicker one will assume that your edits are based on personal speculation and opinion. --Danteferno 14:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Stop Reverting The Gothic Metal Page! PART II
One "book" waiting to be published (if such exists) is not a sufficient source when compared to Metal Archives, Allmusic.com, Ultimate Metal, etc, which are highly reputable in Metal music Circles. So far, the only person who seems to think otherwise is you. If an unpublished, untitled, and anonymous "book" is the best justification for your changes, then there's absolutely no question behind the reason Idont Havaname, Ray Dassen and myself have conserved the original edit vs. yours. --Danteferno 14:40, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Stop Reverting The Gothic Metal Page! PART III
Everything that is provided to you that doesn't support your viewpoint seems to have been "discredited" (NO PROOF PROVIDED) and that there are supposedly other sources with more accurace information (as of now, NO PROOF PROVIDED of such). Essentially you're saying "we're wrong, the proof we're providing is wrong, yet there's no proof that this proof is wrong." Plus, you still have not provided clear and concide evidence for your version. --Danteferno 14:52, 5 November 2005 (UTC)