| Revision as of 05:08, 13 March 2004 editHenry Flower (talk | contribs)Administrators16,447 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:33, 13 March 2004 edit undoCrculver (talk | contribs)3,402 edits Why not spin Testimony off to its own article?Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| I've done version 1.0 of a rewrite: some NPOVing, cutting the rather ejaculatory account of the cello concerto, and expanding and (hopefully) clarifying the Testimony/revisionism section. I have a few hundred pages of stuff to work through on that, so more to come. I'll keep it concise. :) ] 05:08, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC) | I've done version 1.0 of a rewrite: some NPOVing, cutting the rather ejaculatory account of the cello concerto, and expanding and (hopefully) clarifying the Testimony/revisionism section. I have a few hundred pages of stuff to work through on that, so more to come. I'll keep it concise. :) ] 05:08, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC) | ||
| * If the ''Testimony'' debate has become such a large part of the article, why not spin it off to its own article? ] 14:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 13 March 2004
zhongwen doesnt work!
I've done version 1.0 of a rewrite: some NPOVing, cutting the rather ejaculatory account of the cello concerto, and expanding and (hopefully) clarifying the Testimony/revisionism section. I have a few hundred pages of stuff to work through on that, so more to come. I'll keep it concise. :) Markalexander100 05:08, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- If the Testimony debate has become such a large part of the article, why not spin it off to its own article? Crculver 14:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)