| Revision as of 05:07, 4 March 2009 editAstronaut (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,192 edits thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:13, 4 March 2009 edit undoPhilippe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,242 edits →Thank you: cmt.Next edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ==Thank you== | ==Thank you== | ||
| ... for your help with the vandalism on my user pages. ] (]) 05:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ... for your help with the vandalism on my user pages. ] (]) 05:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::I semi'd Astronaut's user pages, and also the talk page. Thanks for sticking it out, ya'll. - <font style="font-family: Papyrus, sans-serif"><font color="#775ca8">]</font></font> 05:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:13, 4 March 2009
-User:Fastily
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
Please do enumerate how my edits to Hamdani's page weren't 'neutral'? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.30.235.62 (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Have tried to make a few things more neutral. Have removed that line prasing the Quaid-e-Azam which you found biased. Hope this is fine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.30.235.62 (talk) 08:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism on yasser latif hamdani page
Dear Fastily,
The vandalism being carried out against "yasser latif hamdani's" page is politically motivated. Yasser Latif Hamdani is not an Ahmadi. He has made it quite clear. And he does not believe that Jinnah wanted Pakistan to "embody Islamic principles". Instead he has passionately argued that Jinnah wanted Pakistan to be a secular state. The edits made by various sockpuppets are clearly motivated and should be removed. Egopearl (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Jerry Yang
Check the footnote that follows "Chinese American" in the lead sentence. It is an interview where Yang states that he is Chinese American. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 12:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know - An IP had claimed it wasn't vandalism so after a google search, it seemed that he was Taiwanese, however, now that you point out the footnote, I definitely agree that the IP's edit is vandalism. - Fastily (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Kawran_Bazar
Based on addition of references and new content, would you please reconsider your opinion? Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 18:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Edit
I was trying to get rid of a biased edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.113.188.191 (talk) 02:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
... for your help with the vandalism on my user pages. Astronaut (talk) 05:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I semi'd Astronaut's user pages, and also the talk page. Thanks for sticking it out, ya'll. - Philippe 05:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)