| Revision as of 19:59, 7 November 2005 editDrboisclair (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,549 edits Providing another example of a scholar who maintains Anti-Judaic/Anti-Semitic distinction← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 7 November 2005 edit undoDrboisclair (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,549 edits spellingNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| <blockquote>One leading Protestant churchman, Bishop Martin Sasse published a compendium of Martin Luther's antisemitic vitriol shortly after ]'s orgy of anti-Jewish violence. In the foreword to the volume, he applauded the burning of the synagogues and the coincidence of the day: ''On November 10, 1938, on Luther's birthday, the synagogues are burning in Germany.'' The German people, he urged, ought to heed these words ''of the greatest antisemite of his time, the warner of his people against the Jews.''</blockquote> | <blockquote>One leading Protestant churchman, Bishop Martin Sasse published a compendium of Martin Luther's antisemitic vitriol shortly after ]'s orgy of anti-Jewish violence. In the foreword to the volume, he applauded the burning of the synagogues and the coincidence of the day: ''On November 10, 1938, on Luther's birthday, the synagogues are burning in Germany.'' The German people, he urged, ought to heed these words ''of the greatest antisemite of his time, the warner of his people against the Jews.''</blockquote> | ||
| ], noted church historian and Luther biographer wrote: "One could wish that Luther had died before ever this tract was written. His position was entirely religious and in no respect racial" . This is echoed by James M. Kittleson writing about Luther's correspondence with Jewish scholar Josel Rosheim, ''Luther the Reformer: The Story of the Man and His Carreer'' (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986), p. 274: "There was no anti- |
], noted church historian and Luther biographer wrote: "One could wish that Luther had died before ever this tract was written. His position was entirely religious and in no respect racial" . This is echoed by James M. Kittleson writing about Luther's correspondence with Jewish scholar Josel Rosheim, ''Luther the Reformer: The Story of the Man and His Carreer'' (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986), p. 274: "There was no anti-Semitism in this response. Moreover, Luther never became an anti-Semite in the modern, racial sense of the term." This might be construed to support the view that Luther's ideas in ''On the Jews and Their Lies'' were ] rather than ] in that they were not motivated by a racial or ethnic prejudice. The ] statement cited below makes this distinction on the basis of chronology, that ] is the prototype of ]. | ||
| In Luther's final sermon he again indicates his desire that Jews would convert to Christianity: "We want to treat them with Christian love and to pray for them, so that they might become converted and would receive the Lord" (Weimar edition, Vol. 51, p. 195). | In Luther's final sermon he again indicates his desire that Jews would convert to Christianity: "We want to treat them with Christian love and to pray for them, so that they might become converted and would receive the Lord" (Weimar edition, Vol. 51, p. 195). | ||
Revision as of 20:00, 7 November 2005
Martin Luther has been accused of Anti-Semitism, primarily in relation to his work On the Jews and their Lies.
In a letter written to Reverend Spalatin in 1514 he stated:
I have come to the conclusion that the Jews will always curse and blaspheme God and his King Christ, as all the prophets have predicted....For they are thus given over by the wrath of God to reprobation, that they may become incorrigible, as Ecclesiastes says, for every one who is incorrigible is rendered worse rather than better by correction.
Seven years later Luther distinguished between the religious and racial aspects of the Jews in his 1523 essay That Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew, telling his followers that
"When we are inclined to boast of our position we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ. We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord. Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are."
Twenty years later, after his overtures to Jews failed to convince Jewish people to adopt Christianity, he wrote On the Jews and Their Lies, a work which has been described as "a notorious Antisemitic document"), and which, according to Paul Johnson, "may be termed the first work of modern anti-Semitism, and a giant step forward on the road to the Holocaust." (A History of the Jews, 1987, p.242)
In the book Luther views the Jews' lineage in quite a different light. He states "There is one thing about which they boast and pride themselves beyond measure, and that is their descent from the foremost people on earth, from Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Rebekah, Jacob, and from the twelve patriarchs, and thus from the holy people of Israel." He quotes the words of Jesus in Matthew 12:34, where Jesus called the Jewish religious leaders (Pharisees) of his day "a brood of vipers and children of the devil", and attributes this characteristic to all Jews. In the book, written three years before his death, he describes the Jews as (among other things) "miserable, blind, and senseless", "truly stupid fools", "thieves and robbers", "lazy rogues", "daily murderers", and "vermin", likens them to "gangrene", and recommends that Jewish synagogues and schools be burned, their homes destroyed, their writings be confiscated, their rabbis be forbidden to teach, their travel be restricted, that lending money be outlawed for them and that they be forced to earn their wages in farming. Finally, Luther advised "f we wish to wash our hands of the Jews' blasphemy and not share in their guilt, we have to part company with them. They must be driven from our country" and "we must drive them out like mad dogs."
Several months after publishing On the Jews and Their Lies, Luther wrote another attack on Jews titled Schem Hamephoras, in which he explicitly equated Jews with the Devil.
Luther's harsh comments about the Jews are seen by many as a continuation of medieval Christian anti-Semitism, and a reflection of earlier anti-Semitic expulsions in the 14th century, when Jews from other countries like France and Spain were invited into Germany. When Luther writes that the Jews should be expelled from his homeland, he expresses widespread feelings of his times, and these sentiments were echoed in the Germany of the 1930s. According to Daniel Goldhagen
One leading Protestant churchman, Bishop Martin Sasse published a compendium of Martin Luther's antisemitic vitriol shortly after Kristallnacht's orgy of anti-Jewish violence. In the foreword to the volume, he applauded the burning of the synagogues and the coincidence of the day: On November 10, 1938, on Luther's birthday, the synagogues are burning in Germany. The German people, he urged, ought to heed these words of the greatest antisemite of his time, the warner of his people against the Jews.
Roland Bainton, noted church historian and Luther biographer wrote: "One could wish that Luther had died before ever this tract was written. His position was entirely religious and in no respect racial" . This is echoed by James M. Kittleson writing about Luther's correspondence with Jewish scholar Josel Rosheim, Luther the Reformer: The Story of the Man and His Carreer (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1986), p. 274: "There was no anti-Semitism in this response. Moreover, Luther never became an anti-Semite in the modern, racial sense of the term." This might be construed to support the view that Luther's ideas in On the Jews and Their Lies were anti-Judaic rather than anti-Semitic in that they were not motivated by a racial or ethnic prejudice. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America statement cited below makes this distinction on the basis of chronology, that Anti-Judaism is the prototype of Anti-Semitism.
In Luther's final sermon he again indicates his desire that Jews would convert to Christianity: "We want to treat them with Christian love and to pray for them, so that they might become converted and would receive the Lord" (Weimar edition, Vol. 51, p. 195).
In 1983, the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, noting that "Anti-Semitism and other forms of racism are a continuing problem in our world," made an official statement disassociating themselves from what they describe as "intemperate remarks about Jews" in Luther's works.
In 1988 Lutheran theologian Stephen Westerholm argued that Luther's attack on Judaism was part and parcel of his attack on the Catholic Church — that Luther was applying a Pauline critique of Phariseism as legalistic and hypocritical to the Catholic Church. Westerholm rejects Luther's interpretation of Judaism and his apparent anti-Semitism, and acknowledges that Paul's critique of the Pharisees is based on a charicature that lacks historical merit. But Westermark points out that whatever problems exist in Paul's and Luther's arguments against Jews, what Paul, and later, Luther, were arguing for was and continues to be an important vision of Christianity.
In 1994, the Church Council of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America publicly rejected what it described as "Luther's anti-Judaic diatribes and the violent recommendations of his later writings against the Jews," and their "appropriation... by modern anti-Semites for the teaching of hatred toward Judaism or toward the Jewish people in our day."
External links
- On the Jews an their lies - complete work, by Martin Luther.
- Antisemitism - Reformation from the Florida Holocaust Museum.