| Revision as of 14:07, 11 March 2009 editSilkTork (talk | contribs)Administrators104,129 edits →Congratulations!: thanks← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:32, 12 March 2009 edit undoRotational (talk | contribs)9,031 edits →Advice needed: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| :Thanks. Yes, a daughter! Seems that's what I make. I only have one son and four daughters! <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 14:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | :Thanks. Yes, a daughter! Seems that's what I make. I only have one son and four daughters! <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 14:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Advice needed == | |||
| Hi SilkTork, I'm sorry to see that you've pulled out of dispute resolution although you're probably wise in managing your ulcers! I hope this problem will merit your attention. | |||
| I think that Rkitko felt the arbitration talks which you managed had fizzled out, and he returned to his former habit of following my contributions and changing them to his interpretation of the MoS. Even worse, he made an ANI out of it and stirred up a whole lot of editors who had nothing better to do. My attempt at reverting the edits got me a 24-hour block for "edit warring". I feel pretty bitter about this, since I follow my old policy of not changing the layout of any article I did not start. However, some editors are not interested in extending the same courtesy. I now find that Rkitko and a few of his symphatisers are altering articles before I've even finished writing them and riding roughshod over 'in use' templates - see the latest article ] which I started last night and has already come in for a fair amount of hacking-about. I really am at a loss and would welcome some positive input. ciao ] (]) 12:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:32, 12 March 2009
"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." Barack Obama Welcome!!! Pull up a chair, let's have a nice chat. I'm glad you called. I'll put the kettle on.
SilkTork My Wiki activity has reduced. I am no longer involved in any content dispute resolution matters, I have cut back my involvement in WikiProjects, editing guidelines and essays, RfA, AfD, GAN, etc. I will bumble along with various random editing and random involvement in Wiki matters.
Though I will consider requests for my attention, I may turn down requests if they look too chewy!
SilkTork
Current messages
WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter
The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Coordinator nominations
Coordinator nominationsThe WikiProject Films coordinator selection process has recently begun! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on March 14! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Congratulations!
Happy, Happy New Father! A daughter I assume? Regards, —Mattisse (Talk) 13:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Yes, a daughter! Seems that's what I make. I only have one son and four daughters! SilkTork * 14:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Advice needed
Hi SilkTork, I'm sorry to see that you've pulled out of dispute resolution although you're probably wise in managing your ulcers! I hope this problem will merit your attention. I think that Rkitko felt the arbitration talks which you managed had fizzled out, and he returned to his former habit of following my contributions and changing them to his interpretation of the MoS. Even worse, he made an ANI out of it and stirred up a whole lot of editors who had nothing better to do. My attempt at reverting the edits got me a 24-hour block for "edit warring". I feel pretty bitter about this, since I follow my old policy of not changing the layout of any article I did not start. However, some editors are not interested in extending the same courtesy. I now find that Rkitko and a few of his symphatisers are altering articles before I've even finished writing them and riding roughshod over 'in use' templates - see the latest article Katey Walter which I started last night and has already come in for a fair amount of hacking-about. I really am at a loss and would welcome some positive input. ciao Rotational (talk) 12:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)