Misplaced Pages

User talk:Xhaoz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:38, 14 March 2009 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits Warnings: reverted in error← Previous edit Revision as of 03:47, 14 March 2009 edit undoEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm Inner Asia during Tang DynastyNext edit →
Line 72: Line 72:
==]== ==]==
The edit you mistakenly reverted was consistent with ]; moreover, it is accompanied by a specific explanation on the talk page. --] (]) 03:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC) The edit you mistakenly reverted was consistent with ]; moreover, it is accompanied by a specific explanation on the talk page. --] (]) 03:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
:This is an especially insidious edit because it superficially appears to conform to expected requiredments -- that is, you would have noted both in-line citations and a link to an ISBN number; however, the strange gambit doesn't withstand further scrutiny.

:This article has been under attack for some time by anonymous IP "contributors" with similar dubious sources which have been addressed ''ad nauseam.'' It appears to me that this may be a PRC-sponsored attack, but it's difficult to see how that odd suspicion can be clarified. For now, the purpose of this codicil is to help you understand a bit more about the situation into which you've unwittingly strayed. --] (]) 03:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:47, 14 March 2009

Welcome

Hello, The Black Void! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Misplaced Pages you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Nja 06:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Arson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. That stuff does not belong here. Even if he had his own article, we wouldn't link to it, because we wouldn't link to any alleged arsonist. THat's not what this article is for. --Rodhullandemu 21:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC) That's OK, I thought you were the vandal, but it was the guy you were reverting. Sorry. --Rodhullandemu 21:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem. § The Black Void § Contribs 21:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Warnings

Edits like this are not helpful. We need to be civil, even to vandals - please stick to the templates if it is not clear what is civil and what is not. Kuru 21:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Inner Asia during Tang Dynasty

The edit you mistakenly reverted was consistent with WP:V; moreover, it is accompanied by a specific explanation on the talk page. --Tenmei (talk) 03:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

This is an especially insidious edit because it superficially appears to conform to expected requiredments -- that is, you would have noted both in-line citations and a link to an ISBN number; however, the strange gambit doesn't withstand further scrutiny.
This article has been under attack for some time by anonymous IP "contributors" with similar dubious sources which have been addressed ad nauseam. It appears to me that this may be a PRC-sponsored attack, but it's difficult to see how that odd suspicion can be clarified. For now, the purpose of this codicil is to help you understand a bit more about the situation into which you've unwittingly strayed. --Tenmei (talk) 03:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)