Revision as of 11:48, 14 March 2009 editMaelgwnbot (talk | contribs)52,548 editsm Robot: Template subst per WP:SUBST← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:08, 14 March 2009 edit undoJzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,071 edits moreNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div style="padding:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for ]. To contest this block, please email me or place <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. This is due to threats and attempting to whitewash ]. Many, many conversations over a very long period via OTRS and Misplaced Pages discussions have clearly failed to bring home the message: reaction to your |
<div style="padding:5px; border:2px solid #F00; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been '''indefinitely blocked''' from editing in accordance with ] for ]. To contest this block, please email me or place <nowiki>{{unblock|your reason here}}</nowiki> on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. This is due to ] and ] ] in violation of our ]. Many, many conversations over a very long period via OTRS and Misplaced Pages discussions have clearly failed to bring home the message: reaction to your university divides between ignoring it and considering it a diploma mill. '''You may not use Misplaced Pages to try to fix that'''. End of. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 08:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)] <!--{{s/block3}}--></div> | ||
We will be quite happy to help correct provable errors of fact, as we have done in the past, but we will not offer any guarantee to interpret sources as you would wish to see them interpreted, nor will we allow you to dictate what weight is given to individual sources, nor will we interpret inclusion in a directory of any kind as asserting parity with other institutions in the same directory. The problem, simply stated, is this: Bircham appears to be marketing itself primarily to a US market, and in the US educational system ] is the primary benchmark. Your institution is listed as unaccredited and explicitly listed as unacceptable by numerous sources. The Misplaced Pages community cannot fix that. We may not, per our core policies and principles, help you to by airbrush those sources out. This has been explained to you patiently over many months byquite a few people but you do not seem willing to accept it; unfortunately that is your problem not ours. Please restrict all future comments to specific, actionable requests for correction of provable errors of fact supported by reference to reliable independent sources. Thank you. <b>]</b> <small>(])</small> 13:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:08, 14 March 2009
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. To contest this block, please email me or place {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. This is due to threats and attempting to whitewash Bircham International University in violation of our neutrality policy. Many, many conversations over a very long period via OTRS and Misplaced Pages discussions have clearly failed to bring home the message: reaction to your university divides between ignoring it and considering it a diploma mill. You may not use Misplaced Pages to try to fix that. End of. Guy (Help!) 08:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)We will be quite happy to help correct provable errors of fact, as we have done in the past, but we will not offer any guarantee to interpret sources as you would wish to see them interpreted, nor will we allow you to dictate what weight is given to individual sources, nor will we interpret inclusion in a directory of any kind as asserting parity with other institutions in the same directory. The problem, simply stated, is this: Bircham appears to be marketing itself primarily to a US market, and in the US educational system accreditation is the primary benchmark. Your institution is listed as unaccredited and explicitly listed as unacceptable by numerous sources. The Misplaced Pages community cannot fix that. We may not, per our core policies and principles, help you to by airbrush those sources out. This has been explained to you patiently over many months byquite a few people but you do not seem willing to accept it; unfortunately that is your problem not ours. Please restrict all future comments to specific, actionable requests for correction of provable errors of fact supported by reference to reliable independent sources. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 13:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Category: