User talk:Fresheneesz: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:13, 8 November 2005 editOmegatron (talk \| contribs)Administrators35,798 edits Image licensing← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:03, 8 November 2005 edit undoOmegatron (talk \| contribs)Administrators35,798 edits responsesNext edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	<big>''''']'''''</big> 11:20, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)		<big>''''']'''''</big> 11:20, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
	{{clear}}		{{clear}}

⚫	== op amp edits ==

⚫	Please see ]

	Generally, we want to cover opamp circuits the way they are used, not as variations of a universal configuration, so I'm not sure these recent edits are that helpful. Maybe you could put something like that in the ] article, showing the connection between diff amps and all the other varieties? (I did the same thing with a "universal transistor amplifier", and it's not a great idea. See ], for example.)

	Although the use of HTML to represent math in articles is somewhat contentious, using complicated HTML to simulate the same effect as TeX is definitely bad, and mixing both within the same equation is ''very'' bad. Can you restore them to TeX? — ] 16:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

	== Total relations ==		== Total relations ==
Line 31:		Line 23:
	You cut a huge chuck off ] and marked that as a minor edit, without giving an ]. That is not good. Please go to ] and explain your change. Thank you, ] (]) 16:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)		You cut a huge chuck off ] and marked that as a minor edit, without giving an ]. That is not good. Please go to ] and explain your change. Thank you, ] (]) 16:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
	: Actually, I mention above was done rather carelessly. The first thing you cut is the wording talking about the volume of a parallelogram, but you left in however the formula for that volume, so that thing does not make any sense now. Also, you put two links at the bottom which are obviously misspelled. Taking into account that you did not put an ], this edit amounts to basically vandalism. Please use more care. Thank you. ] (]) 16:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)		: Actually, I mention above was done rather carelessly. The first thing you cut is the wording talking about the volume of a parallelogram, but you left in however the formula for that volume, so that thing does not make any sense now. Also, you put two links at the bottom which are obviously misspelled. Taking into account that you did not put an ], this edit amounts to basically vandalism. Please use more care. Thank you. ] (]) 16:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

		⚫	== op amp edits ==

		⚫	Please see ]

			''I'd open to discussion and i'll repost yours and my comments on the discussion page.''

			:Ok I will respond on ]. Just trying to get your attention. — ] 20:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

	== Image licensing ==		== Image licensing ==
Line 37:		Line 37:
	Since it's a derivative work of my ], it must be released under the same license as mine. If I understand correctly, you can use any one of the three licenses I used ({{tl\|GFDL}}, {{tl\|cc-by-sa-1.0}}, or {{tl\|cc-by-sa-2.5}}), or just add the {{tl\|SelfBSA}} multi-license template, as I did.		Since it's a derivative work of my ], it must be released under the same license as mine. If I understand correctly, you can use any one of the three licenses I used ({{tl\|GFDL}}, {{tl\|cc-by-sa-1.0}}, or {{tl\|cc-by-sa-2.5}}), or just add the {{tl\|SelfBSA}} multi-license template, as I did.
	I honestly don't care as long as it's copyleft. — ] 17:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)		I honestly don't care as long as it's copyleft. — ] 17:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

			''Hi, I'm not sure exactly what protocol there is to respond to messages posted on my user talk page - if this is the wrong way please tell me.''

			:There's no protocol. This is fine. Most people put the talk pages they edit on their watchlists, so they'll see your response on there, but if you put it on their talk they'll definitely be notified of it.

			''Also, you mentioned me changing Tex to HTML - that I'll be happy to change back - but the reason I changed them in the first place was to lower the size of the pages (byte wise) and to put slightly less stress on the already stressed servers. It really isn't very significantly smaller, and I can see how it would hamper editing - so i'll change them back - sorry.''

			:Ok, thanks. Generally, ease of editing is more important than server load, and the servers are mostly loaded down by things like editing pages or templates and generating new TeX images, not by serving already-generated images, so it's better to leave them as TeX, the way equations are used everywhere else on the WP.

			''Images created for wikipedia should be as open as the pages created for wikipedia - but thats not my call to enforce.''

			:My images are actually ''more'' free than Misplaced Pages articles, since they're under more than just the GFDL, people can use them for non-GFDL projects, too. — ] 20:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:03, 8 November 2005

Welcome to the Misplaced Pages

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Sam Spade 11:20, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Total relations

I have my doubt about your recent edit to Binary relation, in which you change the definition of total relation from "for all x and y in X it holds that xRy or yRx" to "for all x and y in X it holds that either xRy or yRx (but not both)". In my experience, the first definition is more common; in fact, I don't remember ever seeing the second one. Can you provide a reference in which the second definition is used? In any case, the next sentence, which says that "is greater than or equal to" is an example of a total relation, does not make sense after your change. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 21:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Cross product

You cut a huge chuck off Cross product and marked that as a minor edit, without giving an edit summary. That is not good. Please go to talk:Cross product and explain your change. Thank you, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Actually, the edit I mention above was done rather carelessly. The first thing you cut is the wording talking about the volume of a parallelogram, but you left in however the formula for that volume, so that thing does not make any sense now. Also, you put two links at the bottom which are obviously misspelled. Taking into account that you did not put an edit summary, this edit amounts to basically vandalism. Please use more care. Thank you. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

op amp edits

Please see Talk:Operational_amplifier_applications#Recent_edits_by_Fresheneesz

I'd open to discussion and i'll repost yours and my comments on the discussion page.

Ok I will respond on Talk:Operational amplifier applications. Just trying to get your attention. — Omegatron 20:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Image licensing

You licensed Image:Opamp-noninverting.png as NoRightsReserved. Since it's a derivative work of my Image:Opampnoninverting.png, it must be released under the same license as mine. If I understand correctly, you can use any one of the three licenses I used ({{GFDL}}, {{cc-by-sa-1.0}}, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}), or just add the {{SelfBSA}} multi-license template, as I did. I honestly don't care as long as it's copyleft. — Omegatron 17:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not sure exactly what protocol there is to respond to messages posted on my user talk page - if this is the wrong way please tell me.

There's no protocol. This is fine. Most people put the talk pages they edit on their watchlists, so they'll see your response on there, but if you put it on their talk they'll definitely be notified of it.

Also, you mentioned me changing Tex to HTML - that I'll be happy to change back - but the reason I changed them in the first place was to lower the size of the pages (byte wise) and to put slightly less stress on the already stressed servers. It really isn't very significantly smaller, and I can see how it would hamper editing - so i'll change them back - sorry.

Ok, thanks. Generally, ease of editing is more important than server load, and the servers are mostly loaded down by things like editing pages or templates and generating new TeX images, not by serving already-generated images, so it's better to leave them as TeX, the way equations are used everywhere else on the WP.

Images created for wikipedia should be as open as the pages created for wikipedia - but thats not my call to enforce.

My images are actually more free than Misplaced Pages articles, since they're under more than just the GFDL, people can use them for non-GFDL projects, too. — Omegatron 20:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)