Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
All other factors held equal, the greater the notability and encyclopedic merit of a given subject on Misplaced Pages, the higher quality the related article.
All other factors held equal, the greater the notability and encyclopedic merit of a given subject on Misplaced Pages, the higher quality the related article.
*I am the coiner of ], a term referring to a practice in which a page is blanked or deleted to remove unsalvagably atrocious text and rewritten because the subject is still a good candidate for an article. I hope it catches on.
*I am the coiner of ], a term referring to a practice in which a page is blanked or deleted to remove unsalvagably atrocious text and rewritten because the subject is still a good candidate for an article. I hope it catches on.
*Began ], a proposed project to merge otherwise redundant information.
*Began ], a proposed project to merge otherwise redundant information.
This user is a member of WikiProject Margarine, a WikiProject which aims to expand a smooth, buttery spread over Misplaced Pages. Please feel free to join us.
Here's a barnstar for being good to the Star Wars articles. --Coffee 05:04, 5 September 2005 (UTC)For work on VfDs, Take care, Molotov (talk) 22:32, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
All other factors held equal, the greater the notability and encyclopedic merit of a given subject on Misplaced Pages, the higher quality the related article.
Constructive edit warring
As opposed to simply reverting back and forth, I like to review any two edits and devise a third, better edit that uses the best aspects of both while improving. This is better than simple reversion, and I, for one, would like to see any "edit war" using these techniques escalate beyond control. Here's a prototypical example. This diff shows a distinctly poor edit that made the article less readable. My successive edit was a selective improvement on both versions. Occasionally, an edit will be made that's all bad. In those cases, yeah, I'll revert, or just leave it for awhile until I can do a copyedit on the whole article (as to not single out certain edits and thus certain editors).
Inspiration
"I was recently in Brazil. I was recently in India. There are people there without electricity, without computers, without internet, without healthcare. Those people could give a shit about whether we have a link on a toolspage to a tool that might bring in some revenue, and whether some people consider this an affront to their aesthetics. But they need books. They need educational materials. They need freely licensed work they can modify, adapt, redistribute, copy freely, so they can learn what they need to know to have power in their own lives. Misplaced Pages is for them. Not for us. So, we need to be very very very careful about commercialism, and we need to be very very thoughtful about how we can use money to change the world, and that's why I do everything that I do. I hope that explanation is helpful." --Jimbo Wales in #wikipedia, October 23, 2005.
Accomplishments
I am the coiner of keletion, a term referring to a practice in which a page is blanked or deleted to remove unsalvagably atrocious text and rewritten because the subject is still a good candidate for an article. I hope it catches on.
As a test case, merged list from article Gay icon into the Gay Icons category--a project that required over 500 edits. Reactions to the test case will hopefully determine if the project moves forward, and if so, what we will do the same and what we will do differently. If you have an opinion, please post it at Misplaced Pages talk:Merge lists to categories
I removed a lot of original research from the article, which led to the following honor (in the form of a non-sequitur added to the article itself): "The Great Independent Research Purge of Philwelch eliminated most of these inconsistencies by shooting them in the back (See: Order 66)."
BabaJobu: Vague, the only respectable way for a girl to rebel is to have lots of sex with lots of different people.
Philwelch: BabaJobu: And only if those people include myself.
Vague_Pant: Concur with Baba and Phil.
BabaJobu: Phil, actually the rule refers to me, not you.
Philwelch: BabaJobu: If she's fucking lots of different people she'll get to both of us eventually.
Vague_Pant: So will venereal disease.
I grant non-exclusive permission for the Wikimedia Foundation Inc. to relicense my text and media contributions, including any images, audio clips, or video clips, under any copyleft license that it chooses, provided it maintains the free and open spirit of the GFDL. This permission acknowledges that future licensing needs of the Wikimedia projects may need adapting in unforeseen fashions to facilitate other uses, formats, and locations. It is given for as long as this banner remains.
File:Vadertantive.jpg
File:Ultimate Matrix Collection LE.jpg
