User talk:NootherIDAvailable: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 11:58, 4 March 2009 editVerbal (talk \| contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →Homeopathy: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:52, 22 March 2009 edit undoFences and windows (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators50,389 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:


	== Welcome ==		== Welcome ==
Line 78:		Line 77:

	Please be aware that Homeopathy and other pseudoscience and fringe topics are under special measures, as described on the talk page, and that large or controversial edits should be discussed on the talk page first. Also, please familiaries yourself with ] and ]. I'm afraid homeopathyworld.com and similar meet neither criteria. Thanks, ] <small>]</small> 11:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)		Please be aware that Homeopathy and other pseudoscience and fringe topics are under special measures, as described on the talk page, and that large or controversial edits should be discussed on the talk page first. Also, please familiaries yourself with ] and ]. I'm afraid homeopathyworld.com and similar meet neither criteria. Thanks, ] <small>]</small> 11:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

			==Homeopathy, quackery and consensus==

			"Not wedded to" doesn't mean that I might not side on including "quackery" in the lead. You shouldn't leap to conclusions on consensus like that, and immediately trying to make naturopathy following your lead on removing quackery is not good practice, nor is it logical. ] (]) 23:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:52, 22 March 2009

Welcome

Hello, NootherIDAvailable! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Verbal chat 07:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi

Hi, have you previously edited Homeopathy or related articles under a different account? If so could you provide a link to them or name them here. Be aware that homeopathy and other pseudoscience articles are under special editing measures, as detailed on the talk page. All the best, Verbal chat 08:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

No.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

No to which question? Verbal chat 07:38, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I've never edited the article on Homeopathy (because of the controversies) nor have I had a different account here. I haven't even had time to edit much on Misplaced Pages.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Homeopathy

Please be aware that Homeopathy and other pseudoscience and fringe topics are under special measures, as described on the talk page, and that large or controversial edits should be discussed on the talk page first. Also, please familiaries yourself with WP:RS and WP:MEDRS. I'm afraid homeopathyworld.com and similar meet neither criteria. Thanks, Verbal chat 11:58, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Homeopathy, quackery and consensus

"Not wedded to" doesn't mean that I might not side on including "quackery" in the lead. You shouldn't leap to conclusions on consensus like that, and immediately trying to make naturopathy following your lead on removing quackery is not good practice, nor is it logical. Fences and windows (talk) 23:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)