| Revision as of 17:56, 7 March 2009 editFernando S. Aldado~enwiki (talk | contribs)483 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:40, 23 March 2009 edit undoEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits WP:VNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| This I refer to you not to a pick a hole in your coat, but to make you sure that certain things happen whether one intends or not! --] (]) 08:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | This I refer to you not to a pick a hole in your coat, but to make you sure that certain things happen whether one intends or not! --] (]) 08:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| I'm contacting you because of your contributions at ]. In that context, please consider watchlisting one of the threads which is developing at ]. The specific request is awkwardly captioned: | |||
| <center>''']</center> | |||
| I don't construe this as improper canvassing; however, I would expect you to form your own opinion in light of ]. | |||
| If you believe that contacting you was somehow improper, don't contribute. Please pardon my misunderstanding; and do share what you think with me. | |||
| On the other hand, if you believe as I do that your participation in this thread is likely to be seen as constructive, then good .... Do whatever you think best. --] (]) 03:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:40, 23 March 2009
Feel Free to Say High or Leave Comments Fixer1234
Talk:Friedrich Nietzsche
Hello. Having seen your comments above mine on the page mentioned above, I thought you might want to take a look at this RFC: As I see it this is a really annoying agenda-based dispute that proceeds via attrition and it would be in the best interests of those who edit there if it could end soon. Here's hoping you agree. Regards, Alcmaeonid (talk) 04:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words of support. There's still a lot more to be done! ~ Alcmaeonid (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi there. I wish that you comment on this if you could. Thanks for attention. -- Fernando S. Aldado (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Reply against edits for "Children of the corn"
Thanks for the help you provided me on me talk page, however I already have a sound understanding about whatever you referred to me. Omission against “corroboration"; articles "a", "an", "the”; “cite” have been committed deliberately, as I could not clap my eyes on the comprehensive article of "children of the corn". Consequently, there could not have been an imaginative construction at the fixed place, yet their omission is somewhat adjunct to what you committed in my talk page "If you have an questions about the changes I made to you edits" is dubious in accordance of the English grammatical rules.
This I refer to you not to a pick a hole in your coat, but to make you sure that certain things happen whether one intends or not! --Vikaszt (talk) 08:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:V
I'm contacting you because of your contributions at Misplaced Pages talk:Verifiability. In that context, please consider watchlisting one of the threads which is developing at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration. The specific request is awkwardly captioned:
I don't construe this as improper canvassing; however, I would expect you to form your own opinion in light of WP:Canvassing.
If you believe that contacting you was somehow improper, don't contribute. Please pardon my misunderstanding; and do share what you think with me.
On the other hand, if you believe as I do that your participation in this thread is likely to be seen as constructive, then good .... Do whatever you think best. --Tenmei (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)