Misplaced Pages

User talk:John: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:51, 1 April 2009 editJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers215,562 edits archive← Previous edit Revision as of 06:09, 1 April 2009 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,951 edits Date autoformatting pollNext edit →
Line 36: Line 36:


:Thanks for your inquiry. You seem to be laboring under a number of misunderstandings about the nature of our project. One is your apparent belief that one needs to be an expert to edit here; one does not. After all, how could either of us prove we were experts in what is a virtual environment? We are all equal here, you who claim to be an expert in "history, politics or sociology" and I who do not. The other is that because you claim to be an expert in the field your assertions, opinions and commentary will automatically enhance an article. In fact we use ] from ] and ] as the standards here, rather than opinion, however knowledgeable the holder of an opinion believes themselves to be. I notice that you have restored the comments I removed; rather than remove them I have requested that you provide reliable sources which support your statements. If you are unable to do this, the material will have to be removed again. Finally, remember to sign your comments on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will produce your signature and a datestamp, as follows: --] (]) 22:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC) :Thanks for your inquiry. You seem to be laboring under a number of misunderstandings about the nature of our project. One is your apparent belief that one needs to be an expert to edit here; one does not. After all, how could either of us prove we were experts in what is a virtual environment? We are all equal here, you who claim to be an expert in "history, politics or sociology" and I who do not. The other is that because you claim to be an expert in the field your assertions, opinions and commentary will automatically enhance an article. In fact we use ] from ] and ] as the standards here, rather than opinion, however knowledgeable the holder of an opinion believes themselves to be. I notice that you have restored the comments I removed; rather than remove them I have requested that you provide reliable sources which support your statements. If you are unable to do this, the material will have to be removed again. Finally, remember to sign your comments on talk pages with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, which will produce your signature and a datestamp, as follows: --] (]) 22:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

== Date autoformatting poll ==
Hi John, I noticed that like me, you are opposed to any form of dates autoformatting. I have created some ] which you might like to add to your userspace to indicate your position. You will find the boxes ]. Regards, ] (]) 06:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:09, 1 April 2009

  Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.
When leaving messages, please remember these easy steps:
• Use a ==descriptive heading==
• Use ] when mentioning users and pages
• Sign your post with four tildes ~~~~

Click here to leave me a message

Click to show archived versions of this talk page

User talk:John/Archive 2006

User talk:John/Archive 2007

User talk:John/Archive 2008

User talk:John/Archive 2009

User talk:John/Archive 2010

User talk:John/Archive 2011

User talk:John/Archive 2012

User talk:John/Archive 2013

User talk:John/Archive 2014

User talk:John/Archive 2015

User talk:John/Archive 2016

User talk:John/Archive 2017

User talk:John/Archive 2018

User talk:John/Archive 2018-2022

User talk:John/Archive 2022-2024


Hainan

Hey, John. Did you ever decide whether you wanted to put the Hainan Incident article up for FA? It's as good as an FA's we have, better than many, in fact. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 17:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I am flattered. If you think it stands a chance definitely nominate it! Let me know what I can do. --John (talk) 18:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, let me look up the rules for nomming something (I forget these little Misplaced Pages things). Eh, so long as I remember which way to point the claymore, lol. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 19:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. That's very apposite as I am Scottish and of course we invented the claymore. --John (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

OK, let's both watchlist this . A Scotsman who likes beer? Must be a disappointment to the clan.  :) &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 19:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Done, and thank you very much. Yes, most Scots prefer a cup of tea. Alcohol use is severely frowned upon. --John (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

I love tea, but the caffeine effects me rather quickly, so I don't often drink it. Thanks for the link, I was not aware that Scotland ranked higher than the antifreeze-drinking Russ. Eh, it's cool and damp in Scotland, and even though alcohol makes one colder, it makes one feel warmer. Have a drink, it's 10C outside! America only ranked lower because of the plethora of Fundies we have: the rest of us try to make up for it, but don't quite get there. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 19:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

As a moderate drinker I like to think that when I moved to California from Scotland I raised the average alcohol consumption of both places very slightly. You can get decent beer here, in spite of what people in Europe tend to think there is (thankfully) far more to American beer than Anheuser-Busch. --John (talk) 20:41, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

The only Anheuser-Busch product I like is Michelob, and the seasonal Michelob bock beer. I very much like Yuengling's Black and Tan, but two is sufficient. BTW, in California they've moved on to other drugs.  :) &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 20:50, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

So I hear. Black and Tan has an unfortunate connotation where I come from and I don't think I have ever tried it. I do very much enjoy stouts, porters and lagers but tend to partake of them separately. --John (talk) 22:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, black and tan in the version you allude to is yet another feather in the cap of British imperialism. You might want to try mixing some porter with some bitter, it really is quite nice. Getting porter in Philly is a bit hard, unless you go to a specialty shop, but certainly worth it once you find it. Stout is usually served in the better pubs, and there are some good mircobrews at some of them. Ach, now I'm thirsty! &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 16:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Do you have any kind of software that could rotate the Shenyang J-8 81192 pic 180 degrees? It wouldbe nice if they were seen as "opposing" each other. Just a thought. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 16:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it's a good idea. The serial number on the nose would look funny when reversed though. --John (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I know -- I reversed it and it does look funny. I uploaded it, though here. Think most folks would notice? &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 17:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hah, great minds think alike. I reversed it and restored the serial. See what you think. --John (talk) 17:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Cool! I can't even tell that it was "doctored". What software did you use? Anyway, very nice job! Looks like it just might make it to FA status.  :) &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 17:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. Just Photoshop. Hope so. --John (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah, we use to have Photoshop, but it got deleted -- probably one of the kinder. &#0149;Jim62sch&#0149; 17:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I just noticed this conversation, as I still happened to have had John's userpage on my watchlist since our little NFC brouhaha earlier on. I'm glad I didn't "unwatch" it. This is great photo work; and a very impressive result. My compliments. ... Kenosis (talk) 02:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I was pleased with it myself. Ironically in view of our previous interaction we just lost the lead image from that article as it isn't a free pic. We'd be into constructing a fair use rationale, which we may do if there's a consensus the article needs it. Good to see you in happier circumstances. --John (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry.

I'm sorry. I will try and remember this next time. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.38.99 (talk) 02:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Irish-Scots

Hi. Is there any particular reason you chose to remove my edits of the Irish-Scots page? I don't imagine it should be a page solely for mawkish trivia and common sense comment. I see your list of main interests/activities does not include history, politics or sociology (specifically in relation to Scotland, Britain and Ireland), subjects which I am quite interested in and knowledgeable about (up to PhD level). At least provide a reason for any pointless editing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Reefyj (talkcontribs)

Thanks for your inquiry. You seem to be laboring under a number of misunderstandings about the nature of our project. One is your apparent belief that one needs to be an expert to edit here; one does not. After all, how could either of us prove we were experts in what is a virtual environment? We are all equal here, you who claim to be an expert in "history, politics or sociology" and I who do not. The other is that because you claim to be an expert in the field your assertions, opinions and commentary will automatically enhance an article. In fact we use verifiability from reliable sources and neutral point of view as the standards here, rather than opinion, however knowledgeable the holder of an opinion believes themselves to be. I notice that you have restored the comments I removed; rather than remove them I have requested that you provide reliable sources which support your statements. If you are unable to do this, the material will have to be removed again. Finally, remember to sign your comments on talk pages with ~~~~, which will produce your signature and a datestamp, as follows: --John (talk) 22:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Date autoformatting poll

Hi John, I noticed that like me, you are opposed to any form of dates autoformatting. I have created some userboxes which you might like to add to your userspace to indicate your position. You will find the boxes here. Regards, Ohconfucius (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)