| Revision as of 23:28, 6 April 2009 editDan~enwiki (talk | contribs)1,695 edits quick summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:39, 6 April 2009 edit undoWill in China (talk | contribs)860 edits lay off CHANGING MY TEXTNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| So Vassyana, I say that ''as Sutin points out, you can't remove "God" or add more deities or even make "God" optional without creating something new. The article can cite people claiming that you can, but only if it presents their views together with this scholarly account.'' Then we have the argument that including Sutin's account with theirs "is not neutral". I obviously can't tell if I've made a real compromise with a user view that I don't understand, but I've tried to include all sources and published POVs. Please make a decision. ] (]) 23:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | So Vassyana, I say that ''as Sutin points out, you can't remove "God" or add more deities or even make "God" optional without creating something new. The article can cite people claiming that you can, but only if it presents their views together with this scholarly account.'' Then we have the argument that including Sutin's account with theirs "is not neutral". I obviously can't tell if I've made a real compromise with a user view that I don't understand, but I've tried to include all sources and published POVs. Please make a decision. ] (]) 23:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :If you would ''leave my text unchanged'' and add your sources and points of view ''in a separate sentence'' we could resolve this much more quickly. I've repeatedly asked you to ''add'' point of view rather than ''alter'' existing text but you persist in changing what I've written which is completely supported by my sources. Lay off with the changes, okay? ] (]) 23:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:39, 6 April 2009
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
So Vassyana, I say that as Sutin points out, you can't remove "God" or add more deities or even make "God" optional without creating something new. The article can cite people claiming that you can, but only if it presents their views together with this scholarly account. Then we have the argument that including Sutin's account with theirs "is not neutral". I obviously can't tell if I've made a real compromise with a user view that I don't understand, but I've tried to include all sources and published POVs. Please make a decision. Dan (talk) 23:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- If you would leave my text unchanged and add your sources and points of view in a separate sentence we could resolve this much more quickly. I've repeatedly asked you to add point of view rather than alter existing text but you persist in changing what I've written which is completely supported by my sources. Lay off with the changes, okay? Will in China (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)