Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Imperial Andermani Navy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:45, 9 April 2009 editLP-mn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,767 edits LP-mn comments← Previous edit Revision as of 00:54, 9 April 2009 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,769 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
* Excuse me if I'm not placing my comments in the correct place, anybody feel free to move or edit them. The idea of deleting any user created content is absolutely abhorent (sp?) in my opinion. David Weber doesn't create enough content or background material as it is, and having Misplaced Pages as a reference source has been very useful to me. DO NOT DELETE!!! Having said that, it IS TRUE that sometimes WHERE the content is is a very legitimate argument. The idea of merging the IAN into ] does make sense, provided that a "#REDIRECT" is left in place. Likewise, a mention in the ] that links to the IAN subsection in ] also makes sense.</br> * Excuse me if I'm not placing my comments in the correct place, anybody feel free to move or edit them. The idea of deleting any user created content is absolutely abhorent (sp?) in my opinion. David Weber doesn't create enough content or background material as it is, and having Misplaced Pages as a reference source has been very useful to me. DO NOT DELETE!!! Having said that, it IS TRUE that sometimes WHERE the content is is a very legitimate argument. The idea of merging the IAN into ] does make sense, provided that a "#REDIRECT" is left in place. Likewise, a mention in the ] that links to the IAN subsection in ] also makes sense.</br>
] (]) 00:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC) ] (]) 00:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
* '''Merge'''. I'd even more support proper transwikifying to Honorverse wiki. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 00:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:54, 9 April 2009

Imperial Andermani Navy

Imperial Andermani Navy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Entirely unreferenced in-universe plot summary with no assertion or hint of notability -- soundly fails WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:RS, WP:GNG. Being marked for cleanup for more than a year has yielded only tweaks to insignificant trivia. --EEMIV (talk) 22:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

LP-mn (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Categories: