Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:50, 11 April 2009

• WP:ASTAR
• P:ASTAR

Miscellaneous
Born	(1973-10-12) October 12, 1973 (age 51) Mississippi
Zodiac	♎ Libra ♎
Chinese Zodiac	Water Ox
Nationality	American Italian
Party	Yes please...
Husband	Todd
Species	Homosexual human
Children	Toko (cat)
Alma mater	Ole Miss
Profession	Big Ballin'
Religion	Pragmatic Agnostic
Signature	✰ALLST☆R✰
Website	onion.com
Footnotes: Is NOT your stereotypical gay man. Does NOT like Cher or Madonna or any other diva type. Loves collge football, Lazy Magnolia Southern Pecan beer, American-Chinese food, Southern sweet tea, gay porn and uses his right hand.

User:Allstarecho/Navbar2

Archives
Sept. 2007 - Oct. 2007 Oct. 2007, cont. Oct. 2007, cont. - Dec. 2007 Dec. 2007, cont. - Jan. 2008 Jan. 2008, cont. - Feb. 2008 Feb. 2008, cont. Feb. 2008, cont. - March 2008 March 2008, cont. March 2008, cont. - January 2009 February 2009 - PRESENT COMING SOON! Newsletter Archive Incidents Archive
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Threads with no replies in 5 days may be automatically moved.
edit

Layout

I like the rainbow of colored boxes. The page is clear and easy to read. The only thing is that (at least on the display I'm looking at here), the main text boxes don't begin until below your sidebar. That looks a little weird, but is a minor point. I think it's much easier to read your page with this layout than the one you had before. LadyofShalott 01:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

That's what I was trying to avoid, the issue with the text boxes beginning after the sidebar. On My display, it doesn't do that. They show up evenly on the page, side by side. Uhg. Thanks for the input. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 01:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

What size monitor are you using and what is the resolution set at? - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 06:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I'll have to check later on when I'm back at home. For now, I'm looking at it on a different machine, and the sidebar just overlaps a little with the other boxes. LadyofShalott 13:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

New layout

p.s. I love that it doesn't go waaaay off to the side anymore. -- Banjeboi 08:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

But are you having the same issues with it as LadyofShalott - where the different color boxes don't start until the bottom of the right-hand side infobox? - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 08:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Not that I can see, it looks fine. -- Banjeboi 18:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Looks perfectly fine to me. Browsers = Safari, Camino, Firefox, iCab; system = Mac OS X 10.4.11 and 10.3.9; hardware = iMac G5 and iMac G3. ~_{Teledildonix314}~~_4-1-1~ 19:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. It's probably got something to do with monitor size and resolution setting. I use a widescreen monitor set at 1680 x 1050 resolution. Smaller resolutions, such as 1024 x 768 may have an issue with the layout. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 19:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hate crime

Perhaps I'm just slow, but I do not see how a list of executions supports the statement "...it is well known throughout the international community that Iran has and continues to have state-sponsored torture and executions of homosexuals...". Kevin (talk) 08:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Look at the bottom of the list. You can choose to sort the results by "crime" including "Homosexual act" and "Homosexual rape". - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 08:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes I see that. And "well known in the international community" is not remotely supported is it? Your other 2 refs seem equally problematic, one is Wikinews, not a reliable source, and the other is a blog. Kevin (talk) 08:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiNews is a reliable source. And the "blog" is a Sky News reporter, not some kid in the middle of a cornfield blogging about baseball cards. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 17:30, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Not one of those sources supports "well known in the international community". The section reads like a synthesis of the source material that draws it's own conclusions, rather than reporting those of others. The whole section describes what I would call human rights abuses that should be detailed at Human rights in Iran. It is tangential to the Hate crime article at best. Kevin (talk) 21:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Huh?

Please explain your warning. I just added a photo that was discussed on the talk page. All of my edits have been consistent with policy and I haven't engaged in 3RR or edit warring and have discussed the reasons for my appropriate edits on the talk page. Given the personal attacks, talk page violations, and aggresive behavior I am facing your warning is very inappropriate. I hope you will correct yourself. Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I just noticed that your talk page is in numerous categories of gay Wikipedians. Notation that he is a prominent advocate and legislator for gay rights has been one of the edits that is being reverted and censored from the Barney Frank article. I don't want you to be accused of COI, but clearly this censorship whatever the motivation is inappropriate and disturbing on various levels. I would welcome your assistance in supervising that article and making sure that guidelines and policies are followed. Thank you. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The merits, or lack of them, regarding the content itself isn't of any concern. That should be dealt with via the article's talk page and consensus. The warning, however, was for edit warring, which you are clearly engaged in on that article. I'm not even going to waste my time linking the diffs of your reversions. You're one more reversion away from WP:3RR and WP:AN3 is where I will focus my diff linking efforts if you continue. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 22:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I am concerned with the content of articles. I think it should conform to consensus guidelines. I'm also concerned with bogus warnings. Your warning suggests I have been edit warring, and it's wrong. Please don't put false statements on my talk page. Anyone who adds something and reverts it once is one edit away from 3RR. It's troubling that you've engaged in a dispute in this way. I hope you'll consider your actions more carefully in the future. Thanks. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Let me put this another way.. I didn't warn you about the content you are removing and the content you are inserting. I warned you for edit warring. The content itself and whether or not the content itself is acceptable, has nothing to do with the warning for edit warring. And yet again, in another way, I have no opinion on the content itself - just an opinion that your multiple reversions and tendentious editing are nearing breach of WP:3RR. Understand now? - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 02:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Only warning.

In case you don't see it on ScienceApologist's page: Allstarecho, consider this a final warning to leave Childofmidnight alone. I will seek admin intervention if I see you continuing to have a go at him. I trust that is crystal clear. //roux   03:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

So you're saying I can't reply to his comments to me? Ridiculous! - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 03:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

You started the interaction at SA's page, not him. //roux   03:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Nothing wrong with pointing out the lies fiction within his comments. He chose to reply to me doing so, in which turn it would be rude to ignore his comments and not reply to them. I guess you'll have to get admin intervention because I certainly won't bite my tongue on the thread at ANI regarding ChildofMidnight and anywhere else he chooses to distort the truth regarding his actions on Misplaced Pages. - ✰ALLST☆R✰ 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Joke?

For your amusement! -- Scjessey (talk) 19:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

• Rouge editors
• LGBT Wikipedians
• Gay Wikipedians
• Gayass Wikipedians
• Queer Wikipedians
• Wikipedian Queers
• Wikipedians interested in LGBT issues
• Wikipedians in Mississippi
• Al-Gayda Wikipedians