Misplaced Pages

User talk:NonResidentFellow: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:00, 14 April 2009 editNonResidentFellow (talk | contribs)60 edits →Stop calling legitimate edits vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 23:22, 14 April 2009 edit undoMashkin (talk | contribs)1,665 edits →Stop calling legitimate edits vandalismNext edit →
Line 19: Line 19:


:Your removal of sourced content, without discussing first, is vandalism. Please desist and avail yourself of the discussion pages before attempting to make changes.] (]) 23:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC) :Your removal of sourced content, without discussing first, is vandalism. Please desist and avail yourself of the discussion pages before attempting to make changes.] (]) 23:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
::That is not true. You cannot put a "source" next to stuff you insert and say that its removal is vandalism. I refer you to ]. The edits in question violate both ] and ]. Your behavior violates ] and of course ]. If you will refer once more to my edits as vandalism I will have to ask that you will be blocked. ] (]) 23:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:22, 14 April 2009


Welcome...

Hello, NonResidentFellow, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 七星 (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Stop calling legitimate edits vandalism

You are calling legitimate and reasoned edits vandalism. This is unacceptable behavior. If you will do once more I will asked that you will be blocked. Mashkin (talk) 22:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


Your removal of sourced content, without discussing first, is vandalism. Please desist and avail yourself of the discussion pages before attempting to make changes.NonResidentFellow (talk) 23:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
That is not true. You cannot put a "source" next to stuff you insert and say that its removal is vandalism. I refer you to Misplaced Pages:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. The edits in question violate both WP:No original research and Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. Your behavior violates Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith and of course Misplaced Pages:No personal attacks. If you will refer once more to my edits as vandalism I will have to ask that you will be blocked. Mashkin (talk) 23:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)