| Revision as of 14:30, 15 April 2009 editPhoenix of9 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers2,082 edits →Comment: resp← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:45, 15 April 2009 edit undoCollect (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers47,160 edits →Comment: thanksNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :What makes you think ] and ] are about 2008 Presidential election? ] (]) 14:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | :What makes you think ] and ] are about 2008 Presidential election? ] (]) 14:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :I shall endeavor to be less involved in any case with political articles -- they make up less than 10% of the articles I have worked on at this point. Finding that some people do not necessarily share my absolute commitment as a traditional northeast liberal to be NPOV is tough sometimes. Thanks for the comment. ] (]) 14:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:45, 15 April 2009
Comment
I see that all the complaints about this editor seem to be involved with articles directly related to the 2008 Presidential election. It looks to me that people on the other side of the issues want to eliminate some of their competition. One solution would be for WP to have a little less politically motivated editing all around. Steve Dufour (talk) 12:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- What makes you think Drudge Report and Fascism are about 2008 Presidential election? Phoenix of9 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- I shall endeavor to be less involved in any case with political articles -- they make up less than 10% of the articles I have worked on at this point. Finding that some people do not necessarily share my absolute commitment as a traditional northeast liberal to be NPOV is tough sometimes. Thanks for the comment. Collect (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)