| Revision as of 14:33, 13 March 2004 editCrculver (talk | contribs)3,402 edits Why not spin Testimony off to its own article?← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:49, 13 March 2004 edit undoCamembert (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,991 edits article on testimony would be fineNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| * If the ''Testimony'' debate has become such a large part of the article, why not spin it off to its own article? ] 14:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC) | * If the ''Testimony'' debate has become such a large part of the article, why not spin it off to its own article? ] 14:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC) | ||
| It certainly wouldn't be a bad idea to have an article specifically on ''Testimony'' (at ] with a note pointing there form ]), though there needs to be some mention of it here as well, of course. --] | |||
Revision as of 14:49, 13 March 2004
zhongwen doesnt work!
I've done version 1.0 of a rewrite: some NPOVing, cutting the rather ejaculatory account of the cello concerto, and expanding and (hopefully) clarifying the Testimony/revisionism section. I have a few hundred pages of stuff to work through on that, so more to come. I'll keep it concise. :) Markalexander100 05:08, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
- If the Testimony debate has become such a large part of the article, why not spin it off to its own article? Crculver 14:33, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)
It certainly wouldn't be a bad idea to have an article specifically on Testimony (at Testimony (book) with a note pointing there form Testimony), though there needs to be some mention of it here as well, of course. --Camembert