Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Macedonia (terminology)/archive2: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:21, 18 April 2009 editFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,181 edits +review  Revision as of 14:35, 18 April 2009 edit undoAvg (talk | contribs)3,233 edits Macedonia (terminology): CloseNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


] ] 14:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC) ] ] 14:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
:'''Close'''.This is a ] nomination just on the eve of the ] by an involved party, with a direct objective to undermine the feature status of this article, which elaborates on the ambiguity and complexity of the issue.--] (]) 14:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:35, 18 April 2009

Macedonia (terminology)

Current problems with this article:

  • Etymology section: was an amateurish and redundant mix-up of actual etymology and mythology. Partly cleaned up now, by importing text from elsewhere, but may need further scrutiny.
  • History section: far too wordy and far too much detail. This is a complete fork of a "History of Macedonia" article. It needs to be reduced to those bits that are actually necessary for the article's task: making the terminology understood.
  • Linguistics section: account of Ancient Macedonian is confused, making an ad-hoc distinction between "sister language" and "cousin " (which doesn't exist in linguistic terminology), also stylistically awkward.
  • "Ethnic Macedonian nationalism" section: unnecessary POV editorialising about "extremist ... nationalists". Overlong block quote, of a size that makes it a fair-use / copyright problem, should be removed, paraphrased and/or broken down into smaller units. Same for the overlong block quotes in the following section.
  • Geography section: needs better maps/graphics to illustrate the various different boundary lines discussed
  • Demographics section: problematic POV statement that "As a regional group in Greece, Macedonians refers to ethnic Greeks (98%, 2001)". This specifically Greek meaning (as opposed to one that covers all the ethnicities including the Greeks and the local minorities) seems barely existant in English.

Fut.Perf. 14:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Close.This is a WP:POINT nomination just on the eve of the Macedonia arbitration by an involved party, with a direct objective to undermine the feature status of this article, which elaborates on the ambiguity and complexity of the issue.--Avg (talk) 14:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)