| Revision as of 22:12, 13 November 2005 editTed Wilkes (talk | contribs)18,934 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:05, 16 November 2005 edit undoFred Bauder (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,115 edits →Questions by Ted WilkesNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| I was suspended for 30 days, but was never reinstated. I retired. ] 20:29, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | I was suspended for 30 days, but was never reinstated. I retired. ] 20:29, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| When ] asked if you would be interested in serving on the ] did you advise him that you were under ] by the ]? - ] 22:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | When ] asked if you would be interested in serving on the ] did you advise him that you were under ] by the ]? - ] 22:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| No, such a statement would not be factually correct and is irrelevant anyway, If I had actually done something serious it would be a different matter. ] 22:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:05, 16 November 2005
Comments or questions
Some questions being asked of all the candidates by jguk
Q: How old are you and what do you do? (If student, please state what subjects you are studying.)
A: 63, retired attorney
Q: How many hours a month do you think you will need to be a good Arbitrator and are you really willing to put in the time?
A: About 30 hours a week, yes, that is how much I put in.
Q: If chosen, you will need to arbitrate on disputes arising from the creation or revision of articles. Experience of creating and revising articles yourself, particularly where it has involved collaboration, is very valuable in understanding the mindset of disputants who come to arbitration. With reference to your own edits in the main article namespace, please demonstrate why you think you have the right experience to be a good arbitrator.
A: I think the articles which have involved the most successful collaboration have been Communist Party USA, Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, China and People's Republic of China. Although these are controversial articles the breakdowns which occurred have, with the help of others, been successfully resolved. It should be noted that several years of service as an arbitrator has somewhat limited my editing recently.
Q: Please list out what other Misplaced Pages usernames you have edited under.
A: Fredbauder (talk · contribs) Toots (talk · contribs)
Questions by Snowspinner
- As a current arbitrator, you're particularly well-suited to know the current problems with the arbcom. In your mind, what is the biggest problem with the arbcom, and what what will you do differently if reelected to help fix it?
- Our biggest problem is folks who struggle hard to get elected, do a lot of work for a few days, then either quit completely or slow way down, limiting themselves to voting on conclusions, not doing the hard work of investigating problems and proposing solutions. It is hard to predict who might do this, other than in the case of arbitrators who have previously served. Fred Bauder 13:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
- You write the lion's share of the proposals for the arbcom at present. Do you see this as a potentially negative thing? Do you think it would be beneficial for other arbitrators to take on a larger share of the proposed decisions? Snowspinner 19:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
- We have so much work that those with the time and energy to investigate and make proposals need to do it. The problem with overdoing it is somewhat allayed by the /Workshop page which makes propositions more tentative, allowing feedback before propositions are advanced for actual voting. Recusing from a few cases helps too. Fred Bauder 13:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Questions by Ted Wilkes
I note here and on your User page you state you are a retired lawyer (attorney) and on your Talk page other Wikipedians have referred to you in your capacity as a lawyer. For myself and others, assessing someone's legal training and experience is an important factor for consideration in electing them to serve on the Arbitration Committee. Therefore, would you kindly advise from which university you received your law degree and which State Bar, past or present, you have been admitted to. Thank you. - Ted Wilkes 17:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- University of Denver I practiced in Colorado. Fred Bauder 18:13, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the partial answer, but could you please tell us if you are now or have ever been a member of the State Bar?. - Ted Wilkes 19:30, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Yes Fred Bauder 19:33, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. You were disbarred by the Supreme Court of Colorado in 1999 as per the record here. Could you please tell us if you were reinstated? Thank you. - Ted Wilkes 19:52, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
I was suspended for 30 days, but was never reinstated. I retired. Fred Bauder 20:29, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
When Jimmy Wales asked if you would be interested in serving on the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee did you advise him that you were under disbarment by the Colorado Supreme Court? - Ted Wilkes 22:02, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
No, such a statement would not be factually correct and is irrelevant anyway, If I had actually done something serious it would be a different matter. Fred Bauder 22:05, 16 November 2005 (UTC)