| Revision as of 09:53, 22 April 2009 editSalih (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,179 edits →Chi-Wang Shu← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:30, 22 April 2009 edit undoPeer-LAN (talk | contribs)320 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Archive box|]/]}} | {{Archive box|]/]}} | ||
| == Why did you deleted FreeOrion article for no reason == | |||
| Explain your behavior please! You deleted all my work, that's just wrong. The article was new (unrelated with the previous versions) and written by me and was an accurate and detailed, up to wikipedia standards of the open-sourced game. Please undo your action or point me to someone who has the authority to do so. I’m outraged by the lack of respect for someone’s work that you showed. | |||
| == RFA == | == RFA == | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 22 April 2009
 Archives |
Why did you deleted FreeOrion article for no reason
Explain your behavior please! You deleted all my work, that's just wrong. The article was new (unrelated with the previous versions) and written by me and was an accurate and detailed, up to wikipedia standards of the open-sourced game. Please undo your action or point me to someone who has the authority to do so. I’m outraged by the lack of respect for someone’s work that you showed.
RFA
You have my strongest support in your RFA. Good luck and even if you fail, keep up the good work. Cheers!Kingrock 05:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Same here - I am quite certain your rfa will pass but, even if it doesn't, definitely keep up the excellent work!!!
Regards, Fastily (talk) 06:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
actually....
That question is related to a number of different IfD and DrVs. You might want to look at http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Non-free_content#Unacceptable_use #12 and see if your opinion changes. That's probably the core of the question. Good luck! I generally wait to !vote until I see a mass of people you know you !vote... Hobit (talk) 05:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Your Request for Adminship
Dear Vianello,
I have closed your recent RfA as successful per the consensus of the community. Congratulations, you are now a sysop! Please make sure you're aware of the Administrators' how-to guide and are aware of the items on the Administrators' reading list. Finally, please don't hesitate in contacting me if you need anything. Best of luck in your new position! —Anonymous Dissident 02:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hoorah! - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! Just in case, I started reading up yesterday. So, heaven help us, here I go! - Vianello (Talk) 02:57, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Chi-Wang Shu
It seems you have acted in haste in PRODing the Chi-Wang Shu, apparently without reading it. At the time of tagging, the lead clearly mentions him as the 'Named University Professor'. I have deproded it now. If you have any further concerns feel free to take it to afd. Salih (talk) 09:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)