Misplaced Pages

User talk:Blappo: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:25, 24 April 2009 editDayewalker (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,182 editsm Reverted edits by Blappo (talk) to last version by CardinalDan← Previous edit Revision as of 05:26, 24 April 2009 edit undoBlappo (talk | contribs)80 edits re:Stop reverting my editsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== re:Stop reverting my edits == == re:Stop reverting my edits ==


You know fully well that that hidden comment doesn't point at the age but at the college due to edit conflict before. You changed without discussion, you should expect a revert. ]] ''']''' 04:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC) You know fully well that I am an idiot. ]] ''']''' 04:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


== April 2009 == == April 2009 ==

Revision as of 05:26, 24 April 2009

re:Stop reverting my edits

You know fully well that I am an idiot. chandler ··· 04:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Chandler, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. You've been warned . Trying to be cool on the internet always works. chandler ··· 05:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Keith Olbermann has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

3RR Warning on Keith Olbermann

You're now at 3RR on Keith Olbermann. Please read WP:3RR to understand that wikipedia editors are limited to three reversions of the same content per day on an article. Please do not edit war, and discuss things on the talk page. Dayewalker (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Keith Olbermann. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. By just posting a comment you've not created a consensus chandler ··· 05:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)