Misplaced Pages

:Peer review/Ali's Smile: Naked Scientology/archive1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Peer review Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:10, 29 April 2009 editPeerReviewBot (talk | contribs)20,113 edits Linking to semi-automated peer review (bot task 2)← Previous edit Revision as of 10:14, 29 April 2009 edit undoCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits comment on automated peer reviewNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
I've listed this article for peer review because it recently achieved ] quality status, looking for input to help improve writing style further, tweak prose, etc. Thanks, ''']''' (]) 19:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC) I've listed this article for peer review because it recently achieved ] quality status, looking for input to help improve writing style further, tweak prose, etc. Thanks, ''']''' (]) 19:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
:Notes left for ] and ]. ''']''' (]) 20:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC) :Notes left for ] and ]. ''']''' (]) 20:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
;Comment on automated peer review
I looked over the ], nothing much to address from there. The lede conforms with ], the article uses appropriate linking, an infobox is not necessary, and the article utilizes all available relevant material from ] after exhaustive researching. ''']''' (]) 10:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:14, 29 April 2009

Ali's Smile: Naked Scientology

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· WatchWatch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because it recently achieved WP:GA quality status, looking for input to help improve writing style further, tweak prose, etc. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Notes left for Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Scientology and Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Books. Cirt (talk) 20:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Comment on automated peer review

I looked over the automated peer review, nothing much to address from there. The lede conforms with WP:LEAD, the article uses appropriate linking, an infobox is not necessary, and the article utilizes all available relevant material from reliable sources after exhaustive researching. Cirt (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Categories: