Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:06, 1 May 2009 editBecksguy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,058 editsm Topicban of User:CadenS: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 01:48, 3 May 2009 edit undoBrownHairedGirl (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,942,733 edits Baronets: new sectionNext edit →
Line 51: Line 51:


Hi - You are the admin that imposed the topic ban ], from thread ]. As Caden's mentor, I am asking if I need to post a thread at ANI to formally lift the ban as indicated in item #5, or does it expire after the last extension, which timed out at 00:00 1 May 2009 (today). What needs to be done by Caden, me, you, or anyone else? Thanks and I appreciate any help on this. — ] (]) 09:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC) Hi - You are the admin that imposed the topic ban ], from thread ]. As Caden's mentor, I am asking if I need to post a thread at ANI to formally lift the ban as indicated in item #5, or does it expire after the last extension, which timed out at 00:00 1 May 2009 (today). What needs to be done by Caden, me, you, or anyone else? Thanks and I appreciate any help on this. — ] (]) 09:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

== Baronets ==

Hiya

I replied on my talk page to your question about baronets, but then I archived the whole page. The reply is at ].

The reason I archived everything is that I think I have had enough. I have been working through thousands of articles on British Members of Parliament, many of whom are baronets, disambiguating a pile of highly ambiguous names, and now find that it is apparently quite acceptable for Vintagekits to just wade in with a pile of threats and a barrage of abuse and move everything around without checking, while denouncing those who try to undo the mess as "disruptive" and a "disgrace".

I have not yet decided whether I am going to leave wikipedia, but I am considering it. I come here to put my energies into building an encyclopedia, and if the price of that is being dragged yet again into a sordid row with someone whose only interest in the subjects I work on is his hatred of them, then it's simply not fun. --] <small>] • (])</small> 01:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:48, 3 May 2009

User:Black Kite/Navigation

If you are here to query the removal of non-free images in articles, please click here before posting. Thank you.
File:BK01.jpg
Talk Page archives: 01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20-21-22

Help?

Hi Black Kite,

We have interacted before on other issues, and I could use an admin hand or advice, preferably before Google decides to update their index...

I posted this at WP:ANI and I got a rather odd reply/argument from User:Ironholds, which I discussed with him here. I don't agree with his conclusion and would greatly appreciate a second set of eyes, if you have the time.

Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 30.03.2009 12:53

Has been taken care of by another admin, albeit in a somewhat lenient way... Thanks anyway! pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 06:11
Actually, I'd still be interested in a second opinion, if you have the time... Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 08:30

Article undeleted - sorry for templating you

iTunes Originals

A non-administrator is closing hordes of AFD

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ron_Ritzman

Since he isn't an administrator, is it appropriate for him to roam about closing dozens of debates each day, simply because he felt like it? He ignored consensus on one article, which was three keep, one delete, and one redirect, and decided to redirect on his own. Anyway, since he isn't an administrator, I don't think that is appropriate, especially with so many articles he has done this with. Dream Focus 16:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi there

We've never met before I don't think, so hi first. I mentioned your name at WP:ANI here and thought I should let you know. It's not for anything you've done wrong, but rather a comment you made with regard to an issue that was before you earlier. It seems to happening again. Thought you should know. Tiamut 19:52, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Topicban of User:CadenS

Hi - You are the admin that imposed the topic ban User:CadenS/topicban, from thread Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive504#User:CadenS. As Caden's mentor, I am asking if I need to post a thread at ANI to formally lift the ban as indicated in item #5, or does it expire after the last extension, which timed out at 00:00 1 May 2009 (today). What needs to be done by Caden, me, you, or anyone else? Thanks and I appreciate any help on this. — Becksguy (talk) 09:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Baronets

Hiya

I replied on my talk page to your question about baronets, but then I archived the whole page. The reply is at User_talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive_016#Baronet_names.

The reason I archived everything is that I think I have had enough. I have been working through thousands of articles on British Members of Parliament, many of whom are baronets, disambiguating a pile of highly ambiguous names, and now find that it is apparently quite acceptable for Vintagekits to just wade in with a pile of threats and a barrage of abuse and move everything around without checking, while denouncing those who try to undo the mess as "disruptive" and a "disgrace".

I have not yet decided whether I am going to leave wikipedia, but I am considering it. I come here to put my energies into building an encyclopedia, and if the price of that is being dragged yet again into a sordid row with someone whose only interest in the subjects I work on is his hatred of them, then it's simply not fun. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)