| Revision as of 00:20, 15 November 2005 editStbalbach (talk | contribs)24,748 edits rv 1911 text pasted in with no integration, needs a lot of work← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:11, 20 November 2005 edit undoSurrey10 (talk | contribs)476 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The system of appanage has greatly influenced the territorial construction of France and explains the flag of many provinces of France. The word '''apanage''' or '''''appanage''''' stems from the ] ''apanare'' meaning “to give bread” (''panem'', compare the French court title '']''), a ''pars pro toto'' for food and other necessities, hence for a "subsistence" income, notably in kind, as from assigned land. | The system of appanage has greatly influenced the territorial construction of ] and explains the ] of many ]. The word '''apanage''' or '''''appanage''''' stems from the ] ''apanare'' meaning “to give bread” (''panem'', compare the French court title '']''), a ''pars pro toto'' for food and other necessities, hence for a "subsistence" income, notably in kind, as from assigned land. | ||
| ==The original appanage : in France == | ==The original appanage : in France == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| An appanage was a concession of a fief by the sovereign to his youngest sons, while the eldest son became king on the death of his father. Appanages were considered as part of the inheritance transmitted to the puisne (french ''puisné'', 'later born') sons. These lands could not be sold, neither hypothetically nor as a dowry, and returned to the royal domain on the extinction of the princely line. Daughters were excluded from the system: a false interpretation of ] generally prohibited daughters from inheriting land and also from acceding to the throne. | An appanage was a concession of a fief by the sovereign to his youngest sons, while the eldest son became king on the death of his father. Appanages were considered as part of the inheritance transmitted to the puisne (french ''puisné'', 'later born') sons. These lands could not be sold, neither hypothetically nor as a dowry, and returned to the royal domain on the extinction of the princely line. Daughters were excluded from the system: a false interpretation of ] generally prohibited daughters from inheriting land and also from acceding to the throne. | ||
| The appanage system was used to gild the pill of the ] to avoid civil war among throne contenders or the division of the kingdom among princes of royal blood. It was used in this way in ], by the ], when ] divided his empire between his sons ] and ]. This division was a source of antagonism between France and Germany, less so in France, since the treaty was imposed on Lothair by Louis. | The appanage system was used to gild the pill of the ] to avoid civil war among throne contenders or the division of the kingdom among princes of royal blood. It was used in this way in ], by the ], when ] divided his empire between his sons ] and ]. This division was a source of antagonism between ] and ], less so in France, since the treaty was imposed on Lothair by Louis. | ||
| ] was elected King of France on the death of ] in ]. The royal line of France from ] to ] broke entirely away from the ] and ] custom of dividing the kingdom among all the sons. The eldest son alone became King and received the royal domain except for the appanages. Most of the ]s endeavored to add to the royal domain by the incorporation of additional fiefs, large or small, and thus gradually obtained the direct lordship over almost all of France. | ] was elected King of France on the death of ] in ]. The royal line of France from ] to ] broke entirely away from the ] and ] custom of dividing the kingdom among all the sons. The eldest son alone became King and received the royal domain except for the appanages. Most of the ]s endeavored to add to the royal domain by the incorporation of additional fiefs, large or small, and thus gradually obtained the direct lordship over almost all of France. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| ==Equivalents outside France== | ==Equivalents outside France== | ||
| * In Britain, it became usual for princes of the blood to receive ]s, though ]s of lower ranks have been assigned as appanages too, indeed recently again |
* In ], it became usual for princes of the blood to receive ]s, though ]s of lower ranks have been assigned as appanages too, indeed recently again ], third son of ], was made ] | ||
| The practice is certainly not unique to western feudalism | The practice is certainly not unique to western feudalism | ||
| * |
* In ], the '']'' (a type of fief) was often thus assigned to junior relatives of the ruling house of a ], but not as a customary right of birth, only as common incumbents of an essentially meritocratic grant | ||
| ==External link== | ==External link== | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 20 November 2005
The system of appanage has greatly influenced the territorial construction of France and explains the flag of many provinces of France. The word apanage or appanage stems from the Late Latin apanare meaning “to give bread” (panem, compare the French court title Grand panetier), a pars pro toto for food and other necessities, hence for a "subsistence" income, notably in kind, as from assigned land.
The original appanage : in France
History of the French appanage
An appanage was a concession of a fief by the sovereign to his youngest sons, while the eldest son became king on the death of his father. Appanages were considered as part of the inheritance transmitted to the puisne (french puisné, 'later born') sons. These lands could not be sold, neither hypothetically nor as a dowry, and returned to the royal domain on the extinction of the princely line. Daughters were excluded from the system: a false interpretation of salic law generally prohibited daughters from inheriting land and also from acceding to the throne.
The appanage system was used to gild the pill of the primogeniture to avoid civil war among throne contenders or the division of the kingdom among princes of royal blood. It was used in this way in 843, by the Treaty of Verdun, when Louis the Pious divided his empire between his sons Lothair and Louis the German. This division was a source of antagonism between France and Germany, less so in France, since the treaty was imposed on Lothair by Louis.
Hugh Capet was elected King of France on the death of Louis V in 987. The royal line of France from 987 to 1328 broke entirely away from the Merovingian and Carolingian custom of dividing the kingdom among all the sons. The eldest son alone became King and received the royal domain except for the appanages. Most of the Capetians endeavored to add to the royal domain by the incorporation of additional fiefs, large or small, and thus gradually obtained the direct lordship over almost all of France.
King Charles V tried to remove the appanage system, but in vain. Provinces conceded in appanage tended to become de facto independent and the authority of the king was recognized there reluctance. Theoretically appanages could be reincorporated into the royal domain but only if the last lord had no male heirs. Kings tried as much as possible to rid themselves of the most powerful appanages: for example, Francis I confiscated the Bourbonnais, the last appanage of any importance, in 1531 after the treason of the constable of Bourbon.
The first article of the Edict of Moulins declared that the royal domain (defined in the second article as all the land controlled by the crown for more than ten years) could not be alienated, except in two cases: by interlocking, in the case of financial emergency, with a perpetual option to repurchase the land; and to form an appanage, which must return to the crown in its original state on the extinction of the male line. The apanagist (incumbent) therefore could not separate himself from his appanage in any way.
- After Charles V, a clear distinction had to be made between titles given as names to children in France, and true appanages. At their birth the French princes received a title independent of an appanage. Thus, the Duke of Anjou, son of Louis XIV, never possessed Anjou and never received any revenue from this province. The king waited until the prince had reached adulthood and was about to marry before endowing him with an appanage. The goal of the appanage was to provide him with a sufficient income to maintain his noble rank. The fief given in appanage could be the same as the title given to the prince, but this was not necessarily the case. Only seven appanages were given from 1515 to 1789.
- Appanages were abolished in 1792 before the proclamation of the Republic. The youngest princes from then on were to receive a grant of money but no territory.
- Appanages were reestablished under the first French empire by Napoleon Bonaparte and confirmed by the Bourbon restoration-king Louis XVIII. The last of the appanges, the Orléanais, was reincorporated to the French crown when the Duke of Orleans, Louis-Philippe, became king of France in 1830.
- The word apanage is still used in French figuratively, in a non-historic sense: “to have appanage over something” is used, often in an ironic and negative sense, to claim exclusive possession over something. For example, “cows have appanage over prions.”
List of French appanages
(probably incmplete – no napoleonic grants?)
- Louis VI conceded the county of Dreux to his son Robert.
- Louis VIII by his will in 1225: the County of Artois to Robert, the county of Poitou to Alphonse and the County of Anjou to Charles.
- Louis IX accorded the County of Valois to John-Tristan, the count of Alençon, Perche and Clermont.
- Philip III endowed Charles with the County of Valois and Louis with the County of Évreux.
- Philip VI created the duchy of Orléans for Philip.
- John II the Good, on his departure to England in 1360, gave the counties of Anjou and Maine to Louis – the founder of the second house of Anjou – and the duchies of Berry et Auvergne to Jean. Then, in 1363, he granted the Duchy of Burgundy to Philip the Bold.
- Charles VI accorded the Duchy of Orléans to his brother in 1392.
Equivalents outside France
- In Britain, it became usual for princes of the blood to receive royal dukedoms, though peerages of lower ranks have been assigned as appanages too, indeed recently again Prince Edward, third son of Queen Elizabeth II, was made Earl of Wessex
The practice is certainly not unique to western feudalism
- In India, the jagir (a type of fief) was often thus assigned to junior relatives of the ruling house of a princely state, but not as a customary right of birth, only as common incumbents of an essentially meritocratic grant