| Revision as of 02:07, 15 November 2005 edit24.15.77.246 (talk) →Historical background← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:17, 21 November 2005 edit undo193.171.5.33 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ==Victorian morality== | ==Victorian morality== | ||
| Victorian ] sometimes went so far as to deem it improper to say "leg" in mixed company (the preferred ] if such must be mentioned was "limb").{{Fn|1}} Those going for a dip in the ] at the ] would use a ]. Verbal or written communication of ] or ]s was also often proscribed so people instead used the ]. | |||
| Victoria ascended to the throne in ], only four years after the ] of ] in the ]. The anti-slavery movement had campaigned for years to achieve the ban, succeeding with a partial abolition in ] and the full ban in ]. It had taken so long because the anti-slavery morality was pitted against a powerful capitalist element in the empire which claimed that their businesses would be destroyed if they were not permitted to exploit slave labour. Eventually ] owners in the ] received £20 million in ]. | |||
| ] | |||
| In Victoria's time the British ] patrolled the ], stopping any ships that it suspected of trading ]n slaves to the ] and freeing any slaves found. The British had set up a ] in ]—]—and transported freed slaves there. Freed slaves from ] founded and named the capital of Sierra Leone: ]. Thus, when Victoria became Queen the British occupied a high moral ground as the nation that stood for freedom and decency. Many people living at that time argued that the living conditions of workers in English factories seemed worse than those endured by some slaves. | |||
| In the same way, throughout the Victoran Era, movements for justice, freedom and other strong moral values opposed greed, exploitation and ]. The writings of ] in particular observed and recorded these conditions. ] and ] carried out much of their analysis of ] in and as a reaction to Victorian Britain. | |||
| ==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
| *{{Fnb|1}}The apocryphal stories of skirts on ] legs in the name of ] arose from a misunderstanding of the use of sheaths to protect the lower extremities of furniture from damage by footwear and brooms. | *{{Fnb|1}}The apocryphal stories of skirts on ] legs in the name of ] arose from a misunderstanding of the use of sheaths to protect the lower extremities of furniture from damage by footwear and brooms. | ||
Revision as of 07:17, 21 November 2005
You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|October 2005|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.
Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, Empress of India
Victorian morality is a distillation of the moral views of people living at the time of Queen Victoria (reigned 1837 - 1901) in particular, and to the moral climate of Great Britain throughout the 19th century in general. It is not tied to this historical period and can describe any set of values that espouses sexual repression, low tolerance of crime, and a strong social ethic.
Historians now regard the Victorian era as a time of many contradictions. A plethora of social movements concerned with improving public morals co-existed with a class system that permitted harsh living conditions for many. The apparent contradiction between the widespread cultivation of an outward appearance of dignity and restraint and the prevalence of social phenomena that included prostitution, child labour, and an imperialist colonising economy were two sides of the same coin: the various social reform movements and high principles arose from attempts to improve the harsh conditions.
Historical background
The term Victorian has acquired a range of connotations, including that of a particularly strict set of moral standards, often applied hypocritically. This stems from the image of Queen Victoria—and her husband, Prince Albert, perhaps even more so—as innocents, unaware of the private habits of many of her respectable subjects; this particularly relates to their sex lives. This image is mistaken: Victoria's attitude to sexual morality was a consequence of her knowledge of the corrosive effect of the loose morals of the aristocracy in earlier reigns upon the public's respect for the nobility and the Crown.
Two hundred years earlier the Puritan republican movement under Oliver Cromwell had temporarily overthrown the British monarchy. During England's years as a republic, the law imposed a strict moral code of fundamentalist Christianity on the people (even abolishing Christmas as too indulgent of the sensual pleasures).
When the monarchy was restored a period of loose living and debauchery appeared to be a reaction to the earlier repression. See: Charles II of England. The two social forces of puritanism and libertinism continued to motivate the collective psyche of the United Kingdom from the restoration onward. This was particularly significant in the public perceptions of the later Hanoverean monarchs who immediately preceded Queen Victoria. For instance, her uncle George IV was commonly perceived as a pleasure-seeking playboy, whose conduct in office was the cause of much scandal.**
By the time of Victoria the interplay between high cultured morals and low vulgarity was thoroughly embedded in British culture.
Victorian morality
Notes
- Template:FnbThe apocryphal stories of skirts on piano legs in the name of modesty arose from a misunderstanding of the use of sheaths to protect the lower extremities of furniture from damage by footwear and brooms.