Misplaced Pages

Dostoevsky and Parricide: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:41, 25 April 2009 editGood Olfactory (talk | contribs)688,950 editsm Removed category Sigmund Freud; Quick-adding category Works by Sigmund Freud (using HotCat)← Previous edit Revision as of 19:33, 9 May 2009 edit undo216.45.46.25 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Dostoevsky and Parricide''''' is a 1928 article by ] that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern ]: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexual tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the ]. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that ]'s works are diminished by their weak Christian endings. '''''Dostoevsky and Parricide''''' is a 1928 article by ] that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern ]: ], ], and ]. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexual tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the ]. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that ]'s works are diminished by their weak Christian endings--though what does Freud know about his own unresolved problems?


(Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in ] (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. ]'s ].]) (Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in ] (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. ]'s ].])

Revision as of 19:33, 9 May 2009

Dostoevsky and Parricide is a 1928 article by Sigmund Freud that argues that the greatest works of world literature all concern parricide: Oedipus the King, Hamlet, and The Brothers Karamazov. Freud claims that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was a function of guilt he bore at having wished for the death of his tyrannical father who was purportedly murdered by his own serfs. Freud also describes latent homosexual tendencies existing in Dostoevsky, alongside his overt heterosexuality, and explains this condition in terms of the Oedipus complex. Freud attributes a deep neuroticism to Dostoevsky due to his unresolved Oedipal complex, claiming that it prevented him from becoming one of the great liberators of mankind. Ultimately, Freud claims that Dostoevsky's works are diminished by their weak Christian endings--though what does Freud know about his own unresolved problems?

(Freud's first extensive writing about parricide was in Totem and Taboo (1913), widely seen as his watershed work away from clinically oriented subject matter to philosophy. In it, parricide is the great crime at the base of all social evolution. )

Categories: