| Revision as of 19:27, 5 May 2009 editScarian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers28,509 edits →May 2009: Comment.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:27, 12 May 2009 edit undoItalodal (talk | contribs)800 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ] 22:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ] 22:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Misplaced Pages guideline to ] your posts on ]s, ]s, and ] pages. To do so, simply add four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a ] when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read ]. Thank you.<!-- {{sign}} --> <b>] ] ]</b> 15:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Human height article == | == Human height article == | ||
Revision as of 06:27, 12 May 2009
STOP REMOVING CHINESE HUMAN HEIGHT
Are you stupid? Do you know that study is too outdated?
Measuring human height within a population is very easy. Studies do not need to be "serious" in order to be correct.
Do you know that the data from the study is NOT surveyed by the authors of the study?
Please, think it over before you modify something.
Unfreeride 22:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Human height article
You're doing an awesome job and I really appreciate it. No, I dont want to help, because I monitored the article for a couple months already and ran out of patience with the vandalism. I really dont know what the best solution is but I appreciate you working in good faith to help. Soap /Contributions 02:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Also, you said some of the info on my site was wrong. If you dont mind, tell me please, which ones? Soap /Contributions 02:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm kinda busy so I havent copied over your height data to my site yet. But youre doing a great job. I really didnt think that article was salvageable and now it's a lot better than it was before. Soap /Contributions 00:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
May 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend that you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Scarian 11:11, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing music genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 19:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Italodal, you need to WP:SOURCE your genre changes and you should also begin a WP:DISCUSSION on the article's talk page to gain a WP:CONSENSUS for the genre change. People often argue over them and they always lead to dispute because people change them to what they think is the best genre. If you require any assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian 19:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)