Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:30, 20 November 2001 editThe Anome (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators252,970 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 00:36, 20 November 2001 edit undoLarry_Sanger (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
There is a link to 'false document' here, but the meaning of the ] article appears to relate to artistic creations, rather than to forgeries of this sort. There is a link to 'false document' here, but the meaning of the ] article appears to relate to artistic creations, rather than to forgeries of this sort.




We could either: We could either:

* remove the link * remove the link

* change the 'false document' article to reflect the fact that there are non-artistic forgeries * change the 'false document' article to reflect the fact that there are non-artistic forgeries

* change the wording to 'forgery' * change the wording to 'forgery'



-- ]

-- ]

----

Precisely my point.



Also, is it actually agreed by all that it is false? Do there exist rabid anti-semites who believe it's true? If so, then we should say something to the effect that most historians and other sane :-) people believe it's false, but there are a small handful of anti-semites who believe it's true. That is important information, if true, and must be stated fairly if the article is to cohere with the ]. --]


Revision as of 00:36, 20 November 2001

There is a link to 'false document' here, but the meaning of the false document article appears to relate to artistic creations, rather than to forgeries of this sort.


We could either:

  • remove the link
  • change the 'false document' article to reflect the fact that there are non-artistic forgeries
  • change the wording to 'forgery'


-- The Anome


Precisely my point.


Also, is it actually agreed by all that it is false? Do there exist rabid anti-semites who believe it's true? If so, then we should say something to the effect that most historians and other sane :-) people believe it's false, but there are a small handful of anti-semites who believe it's true. That is important information, if true, and must be stated fairly if the article is to cohere with the neutral point of view. --LMS