Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 05:37, 16 May 2009

• Please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
• If I start a discussion on your talk page, respond there. If you start a discussion on my talk page, I will respond here.
• Any vandalism, advertising, harassment, blatant personal attacks, nonsense, forum comments, etc, will be removed without warning.
• Template messages, while legitimate to post here will be removed to prevent overload and clutter.
• Do not remove other editors comments. They will be re-added.
• If you modify your comment after I reply to it here, I will revert back to the last version before I replied. This does not include strike outs.
• Do not use this page for social networking. Any comments unrelated to Misplaced Pages will be removed upon first notice. This applies whether or not stated on this page or not.
• Mere notifications will be boldly removed. While these are appreciated, I want to reduce clutter on my talk page.
• Please do not duplicate a discussion from your talk page to my talk page upon your response. I want to reduce confusion and clutter. While I appreciate such a users generosity to do so, this method is not preferred. Instead, please leave me a message on this page informing me of the reply if you're worried I wont notice.

Archives

December 2007 - January 2008 January 2008 - March 2008 March 2008 - October 2008 October 2008 - February 2009 February 2009 - April 2009

The Kids in the Hall

Nothing "questionable" about it at all. "The show was not able to afford a live studio audience because of the lack of viewers during the series' run. The show utilized a laugh track so that viewers at home, that were watching by themselves wouldn't feel embarrassed laughing." is unsourced POV commentary that has no business being in an encyclopedia article. Bearcat (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rollback

The edit I reverted has been a specific edit being added by multiple IPs and new users, despite consensus that was noted on the talk page, and through various policies, that such info is OR, and should not be included in the article. I realize that I probably should have just undid the edit now, as RB should only be used for blatant vandalism, and aside from the MvA article, I had been using it as such. I'm sorry for messing up like this.— Dædαlus 22:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Just remember to be more careful, and things will be fine. —Mythdon t/c 22:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for watching my back.

Bless you. I am so sick of this little jackass's minions coming to this site to act like a bunch of brainless retards I can't even tell you. Thanks for watching my back. I'll keep on tagging and bagging the socks as they come in. Gratefully, --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome. —Mythdon t/c 00:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

hey

can i keep a picture of a dog on my page or is that banned. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

not related to what i was asking. and besides, I can't edit the page. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know. Just read the rules. —Mythdon t/c 07:06, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

NawlinWiki said it isn't but I don't trust him. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:08, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Click on the image, then read the rules. That's all I can say. I'm not very familiar with image policy. —Mythdon t/c 07:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I hold no interest in bureaucratic policy. Funnyman390 (talk) 07:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Do whatever you want to your user-page (using common sense and within reason). Q 07:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

If you aren't going to read the rules, what's the point in linking them to you? —Mythdon t/c 07:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I figured I could get a summary from you. =p Funnyman390 (talk) 07:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know image policy very well, and not enough that I can help you. You may contact an administrator if you wish for assistance. —Mythdon t/c 07:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

holy cow you're annoying

I've been periodically looking at your edits for a few months now, and it's apparent that you are a pain in the collective ass of everyone on Misplaced Pages who has had to deal with you extensively. You adhere to the rules of Misplaced Pages in a completely useless, unconstructive and annoying way for which you are _constantly_ called out, yet you usually refuse to concede the slightest ground to those who complain about your anal-retentive efforts.

Yes, we get that you want to further the interests of Misplaced Pages. You can accomplish this by acting like a reasonable person and cooperating with others, not by following the letter of the law in a way that agitates everyone around you. Don't you find it at all telling that so many of your edits at any given time are concerned with fending off the complaints of people whom you've ticked off? I don't know what you're trying to accomplish by acting the way you do, but it's not constructive, not helpful to Misplaced Pages or its editors, and not cool.

You are an annoying little kid and need to grow up, and although the nice people here are bound to disapprove of my incivility in saying this, I doubt that anyone will disagree with my sentiments. 72.188.57.92 (talk) 00:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

There are only a few situations where violating policy is legitimate. "Ignore all rules" is not something I'm a big fan of, and will only consider doing what it says if I know that I can improve with violation. Yes, I know that the user that I have been spending time with since day one of my tenure here does not like it, but it doesn't matter to me. I strictly interpret policy, yes, but is it excessive? No. I didn't even know that you as an anonymous editor has been following me around and stalking me, but do I care? No. You do not understand the benefit of compliance with policy, do you? I as an editor will do everything in my power to make sure policy is properly obeyed, with only the most severe and clear exceptions. Am I an administrator? No. Do I wish to be one? Yes. Yes, I do act like a "reasonable person". Since March, my civility has grown stronger than ever, making friendly warnings, requests for explanations, etc. Please understand this comment and then tell me if I'm not correct. —Mythdon t/c 00:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom questions - reminder

Hey Mythdon, just reminding you that you still need to respond to the questions posed to you at the Ryulong case. They're supposed to be done before the 29th, which is tomorrow. Thanks. Hersfold 19:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I know. I just haven't felt like answering them. —Mythdon t/c 19:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Toranger

Huuki Sentai Toranger is a porno, to put it blatantly. As such, I considered that edit obvious vandalism, which is why I left the revert set for its default message. Arrowned (talk) 04:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean by "porno"? —Mythdon t/c 05:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Pornography.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:07, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Recusal and Ryulong case

I have now responded to your request for my recusal in the Ryulong case. My comments and decision can be found on the workshop talkpage in that case. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Maybe not,

Check the ANI thread. Apparently the one who blocked the possible sock was CU.— Dædαlus 04:05, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Could you please show me a link to the thread? —Mythdon t/c 04:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Interview/Chat

I recently came across your involvement in the Ryulong affair. Those that follow the history of Misplaced Pages feel that the RFAR on Ryulong is a significant event along the lines of Watergate. I humbly ask permission to interview you on behalf of my school IT Club's newsletter, if you have time. Thanks in advance. Yardleyman (talk) 05:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC)