| Revision as of 22:00, 23 November 2005 editUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 edits Sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:01, 23 November 2005 edit undoUser2004 (talk | contribs)23,415 editsm →Sources: spNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| == Sources == | == Sources == | ||
| I've reverted the addition of extensive criticisms because they are not sourced. Particlularly when we |
I've reverted the addition of extensive criticisms because they are not sourced. Particlularly when we are making allegation of sexual and financial improprieties we need to have verifiable sources that we can attribute the allegations to. I can't find them in the listed sources. -] 22:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:01, 23 November 2005
Whatever "Administer"'s views might be about Witness Lee, please discuss factual (verifiable) issues in these pages. If you question the neutrality of the article, please state your reasons so we can discuss them. Cokoli 02:25, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
Facts
The editor of the article said to "discuss factual (verifiable) issues in these pages." Please do not write libelous material.
This article fails to explain such basic aspects as Mr. Lee's title, i.e. "Witness". In fact it sounds like an article written by people so familiar with the subjects that they are not aware something might have been assumed.
NPOV Needed
The statement that Witness Lee "experienced salvation" is of course not NPOV.Did he convert to Christianity at this point,or (already a nominal Christian) have a "born-again experience"?Either would be preferable.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 19:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Sources
I've reverted the addition of extensive criticisms because they are not sourced. Particlularly when we are making allegation of sexual and financial improprieties we need to have verifiable sources that we can attribute the allegations to. I can't find them in the listed sources. -Willmcw 22:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)