| Revision as of 07:08, 22 March 2004 editGolbez (talk | contribs)Administrators66,915 edits More fun with colors← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:49, 22 March 2004 edit undoGolbez (talk | contribs)Administrators66,915 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
| The naming convention makes more sense your way; I've already moved ] and ] to reflect it. I usually think of it as West-to-East, because that's the way I'm usually headed; but I think it's up to us on this one. ] 06:55, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC) | The naming convention makes more sense your way; I've already moved ] and ] to reflect it. I usually think of it as West-to-East, because that's the way I'm usually headed; but I think it's up to us on this one. ] 06:55, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ---- | |||
| Current table draft: | |||
| {| border=1 align=center width=700 | |||
| !align=center bgcolor="#b0c4de" colspan=4|] (]) | |||
| |+ | |||
| !align=center|Line | |||
| !align=center|Previous Station | |||
| !align=center|Current Station | |||
| !align=center|Next Station | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |rowspan=2 align=center|Foggy Bottom-GWU | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |- | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |align=center|] | |||
| |} | |||
| I got rid of the line colors; blue on blue would be unreadable. I also hard-coded the width, since it makes it a little more attractive. | |||
| This doesn't specifically belong here, but since I linked the lines, might as well mention it, and taking a cue from existing pages ] and ]. Personally, I like the former format better, and makes me wonder if we shouldn't use a similar format for stations? (I hate waffling like this...) like, "Foggy Bottom-GWU (Washington Metro station)"? I dunno. But as for ''line names'', I like the parenthetical form better, because 'Blue Line' is pretty generic, yet I can't think of a way to incorporate the description; "Blue Line of the Washington Metro"? Seems a bit long winded. I think I prefer "Blue Line (Washington Metro)". --] 07:49, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:49, 22 March 2004
So, there's not been much work on this in a while. Is this the proper place to make suggestions?
- A list of notable places near the station, perhaps crosslinked back from those places.
- The address or intersection of the station
Any other suggestions? The project as it exists now is pretty bare bones.
I just made some large changes to the template page, I hope I did this all correctly. --Golbez 05:27, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
This looks good. I'll look over my contributions thus far to follow this. Unfortunately, I don't know the table markup, but I'll do what I can. --Meelar 05:32, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Here's a proposal for the footer table:
Single line:
| Washington Metro (List) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lines | Previous Station | Current Station | Next Station |
| Red Line | Rockville | Twinbrook | White Flint |
Multiple lines:
| Line | Previous Station | Current Station | Next Station |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Line | Arlington Cemetery | Rosslyn | Foggy Bottom-GWU |
| Orange Line | Court House | McPherson Square |
Everything would be wikified except current station. In fact, I could see this being used to link systems together, as in this (fictitious) example
| Line | Previous Station | Current Station | Next Station |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Line | Judiciary Sq | Union Station | Rhode Island Ave |
| Amtrak Northeast Corridor | Baltimore | Richmond |
A style note - should the 'previous', 'next' be West-East or East-West? Usual notation is to do East-West, but I've always envisioned the Washington Metro as going West to East. ;) Maybe it should be on a per-system basis, or abandoned altogether?
Also, do you have any comment on my naming proposal?
EDIT: Added a color to the first one, just to see how it works. And now even more color! Just to see how it works. May render things unreadable. --Golbez 06:51, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
The naming convention makes more sense your way; I've already moved Tenleytown-AU and Metro Center to reflect it. I usually think of it as West-to-East, because that's the way I'm usually headed; but I think it's up to us on this one. Meelar 06:55, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Current table draft:
| Washington Metro (List) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line | Previous Station | Current Station | Next Station |
| Blue Line | Rosslyn | Foggy Bottom-GWU | Farragut West |
| Orange Line | Court House | Farragut West | |
I got rid of the line colors; blue on blue would be unreadable. I also hard-coded the width, since it makes it a little more attractive.
This doesn't specifically belong here, but since I linked the lines, might as well mention it, and taking a cue from existing pages Blue Line (Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) and Circle Line. Personally, I like the former format better, and makes me wonder if we shouldn't use a similar format for stations? (I hate waffling like this...) like, "Foggy Bottom-GWU (Washington Metro station)"? I dunno. But as for line names, I like the parenthetical form better, because 'Blue Line' is pretty generic, yet I can't think of a way to incorporate the description; "Blue Line of the Washington Metro"? Seems a bit long winded. I think I prefer "Blue Line (Washington Metro)". --Golbez 07:49, 22 Mar 2004 (UTC)