Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 edit Daedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 editsm ←Created page with '{{subst:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} <!--## Add further sockpuppets …'Next edit → |
(No difference) |
Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009
Caden
Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.
Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Corpiestre (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Evidence submitted by Daedalus969
- Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comments by other users
- CheckUser requests
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review. Requested by — Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
- Conclusions
Categories: