Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 editsm ←Created page with '{{subst:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} <!--## Add further sockpuppets …'  Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 edit undoSPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs)30,768 edits BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)Next edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
{{SPIcat}} {{SPIcat}}


;Suspected sockpuppets <!-- BOTDONE_USER_NOTICE DO_NOT_MODIFY ]] (THIS CURRENTLY IS NOT ACTIVE, this comment is for testing only) -->
;Suspected sockpuppets
* {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}}
<!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##--> <!--## Add further sockpuppets if any, below these ##-->

Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009

Caden

Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.


Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets

This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Daedalus969


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by — Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions


Categories: