Revision as of 17:48, 20 May 2009 editSceptre (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors79,173 edits Final warning: Editing tests. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:02, 20 May 2009 edit undoGeorge Pelltier (talk | contribs)407 edits →May 2009Next edit → | ||
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br/> The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 17:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ] This is the '''last warning''' you will receive for your disruptive edits. <br/> The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages{{#if:|, as you did to ]}}, you '''will''' be ] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> ''']''' <sup>(])</sup> 17:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Apparently suggesting that ] be merged with ] is "disruptive". I don't know how or why this is but ] seems to think that my proposal "was not serious". He does not assume good faith and is possibly OCD over a wiki page about a fictional character. He refuses to say why my proposal was not serious.] (]) 23:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:02, 20 May 2009
Welcome!
|
PRODs
- Actually, you don't need a reason to remove PRODs. I removed them because they've been previously placed on AfD, so it is not reasonable to think that no one would contest their deletion. JuJube (talk) 07:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- Also, replacing removed PRODs is considered vandalism, so don't do it. Use AfD. JuJube (talk) 07:55, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
- You could just assume good faith because it was an honest mistake. George Pelltier (talk) 07:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to point out that the AfD listings you have created are improperly done. Please read WP:AFDHOWTO. ~Itzjustdrama 16:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- And what DGG says is true. Try to open up a merge discussion instead of nominating for deletion.
- I'd like to point out that the AfD listings you have created are improperly done. Please read WP:AFDHOWTO. ~Itzjustdrama 16:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- btw,there are two things you forgot to do when you placed the prods:
- . It is absolutely necessary to use an edit summary saying that you are proposing deletion. This is so the editors, and we admins,can easily identify this is the page history. This is not optional, but a requirement.
- . You really ought to notify the primary authors of an article when you place a prod, and especially an afd. They need and deserve a chance to improve the article, or to argue for it, or at least respond. This is not actually a formal requirement, though almost everyone does it. Wouldn't you want to be notified? Dont you want to see articles improved if possible.? DGG (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Boston pubic
Probably many of these extremely poorly written articles could well be combined into combination article, with all of them being rewritten in a more mature fashion--but that is not the same as delete, which is a last resort only.DGG (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC) .
WP:AFDHOWTO
Please read and follow the directions in that link. Actually, please self-revert every nomination you've made and rethink them. I'm assuming basically every one will be snow kept once people find the discussions. --Onorem♠Dil 02:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
May 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Gordie Howe has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Gordie Howe has been reverted (again), as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation or any discussion in Talk:Gordie_Howe. If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. (Centpacrr (talk) 23:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC))
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages, you will be blocked from editing. Sceptre 17:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently suggesting that Thirteen (House) be merged with House (TV series) is "disruptive". I don't know how or why this is but User:Sceptre seems to think that my proposal "was not serious". He does not assume good faith and is possibly OCD over a wiki page about a fictional character. He refuses to say why my proposal was not serious.George Pelltier (talk) 23:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)