Misplaced Pages

talk:Equality: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:53, 22 May 2009 editJojhutton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,483 edits If you disagree with my proposal...: re← Previous edit Revision as of 03:56, 22 May 2009 edit undoMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,597 edits If you disagree with my proposal...: +replyNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:


I don't know if I disagree, rather than think that it is not needed. Rules are already in place to deal with these matters and even if this was a policy, it would just be ignored anyway.--] (]) 03:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC) I don't know if I disagree, rather than think that it is not needed. Rules are already in place to deal with these matters and even if this was a policy, it would just be ignored anyway.--] (]) 03:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

:Policy should be descriptive. It isn't descriptive to pretend that all users are treated equally. --] (]) 03:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:56, 22 May 2009


I believe in this.

Anything less will destroy us in the end. rootology/equality 03:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

  • It's about damned time someone wrote something like this. To be honest, I don't think it will ever because a policy, because that would turn the way things work around here on their ear, but it is a good start if people will start treating everyone from admins to IP users the same when they commit bad behavior. - NeutralHomerTalk03:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

If you disagree with my proposal...

Why? This policy has no element of WP:CREEP, as it simply calls for application on all of us, of what is already policy. It's a meta-policy, perhaps. If you honestly feel not all users should be held to the same standards, I'd honestly like to understand your reasoning for that. rootology/equality 03:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if I disagree, rather than think that it is not needed. Rules are already in place to deal with these matters and even if this was a policy, it would just be ignored anyway.--Jojhutton (talk) 03:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Policy should be descriptive. It isn't descriptive to pretend that all users are treated equally. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:56, 22 May 2009 (UTC)