Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pablo X: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:12, 20 May 2009 editPablo X (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,600 edits -→Talkback← Previous edit Revision as of 05:00, 24 May 2009 edit undoJack Merridew (talk | contribs)34,837 edits →the whole world is watching: new sectionNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:


Cheers! ] (]) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC) Cheers! ] (]) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

== the whole world is watching ==

* ]
* ]
You may want to watchlist all the case pages. Cheers, ] 05:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:00, 24 May 2009


Please click here to post a new message. You'll be joining these people. If you leave me a message on this page, I will reply on this page; if I have left you a message on your talk page please reply there, I will be watching it. There's no need to leave one of those ugly {{talkback}} messages.
You can email me if you wish, however I prefer most wp communications to remain on-wiki and also only access this address between about 20:00 and 23:59 Zulu on (most) weekdays; response may be slooooooooow.
This page was last edited by Jack Merridew.

Damn ye, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, I'm a better man than all of ye milksops put together

User:Pablomismo/bottomtab


yahn (2005—2007) | tahn (2009)

Regarding G. Shanmugam

A Good Morning to you (at least it's morning here). To deny a speedy deletion it is sufficient if there are alegations of notability (which in this case were there: "...eminent.." and "...leading the institute to become one of the best self financed...". I agree that the article would probably be deleted via an AfD, but speedy is out of the question. Cheeers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 06:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

explanation

I removed an unreference tag from an article that already had references.

I see now you added the tag, and then added the references.

There are, I am afraid, some contributors who go around slapping tags like {{unreferenced}} on articles without regard to whether they are applicable, based on their personal cultural biases. I thought this tag application was an example of that.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

the whole world is watching

You may want to watchlist all the case pages. Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)