Misplaced Pages

Patriot Act: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:37, 25 November 2001 editThe Cunctator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators7,983 editsm *Just a start.← Previous edit Revision as of 18:39, 25 November 2001 edit undoThe Cunctator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators7,983 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism''' (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001 (H.R. 3162) was passed and signed into law on October 26, 2001 in response to the ]. The '''Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001''' (USA PATRIOT Act, H.R. 3162) was passed and signed into law on October 26, 2001 in response to the ].





Revision as of 18:39, 25 November 2001

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act, H.R. 3162) was passed and signed into law on October 26, 2001 in response to the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attack.


The act is 342 pages long and amends over fifteen statutes.


  • Section 412 expands the notion of who should be considered a terrorist


Before passage, only members of the groups designated as terrorist organizations by the State Department could be denied entry to or deported from the United States


The Act extends those actions to any foreigner who publicly endorses terrorist activity, belongs to a group that does, or provides support to a group that does.


The definition of "terrorist activity" is extended to include any foreigner who uses "dangerous devices" or raises money for a terrorist group, whether or not he or she knows the group is engaged in terrorism



The attorney general can order the detention of any foreigners if he certifies that he has "reasonable grounds to believe" involvement in terrorism or activity that poses a danger to national security. He does not need to explain his reasoning or show evidence. Criminal or immigration violation charges have to be brought against such people within seven days, but they can be held indefinitely.


  • expands surveillance with reduced checks and balances
  • expands powers and penalties without direct relation to terrorism
    • Section 217 allows government spying on suspected computer trespassers with no need for a court order
    • Section 503 adds collection of samples to a DNA database for terrorists, as well as for the category of "any crime of violence."
    • allows wiretaps for suspected violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, including anyone suspected of "exceeding the authority" of a computer used in interstate commerce, causing over $5000 worth of combined damage.
    • greatly increases the scope and penalties of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, including 1) raising the maximum penalty for violations to 10 years (from 5) for a first offense and 20 years (from 10) for a second offense; 2) ensuring that violators only need to intend to cause damage generally, not intend to cause damage or other specified harm over the $5,000 statutory damage threshold; 3) allowing aggregation of damages to different computers over a year to reach the $5,000 threshold; 4) enhancing punishment for violations involving any (not just $5,000) damage to a government computer involved in criminal justice or the military; 5) including damage to foreign computers involved in US interstate commerce; 6) including state law offenses as priors for sentencing; 7) expanding the definition of loss to expressly include time spent investigating, responding, for damage assessment and for restoration.
    • expands the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, from the situations where the suspicion that the person is the agent of a foreign government is "the" purpose of the surveillance to any time that this is "a significant purpose" of the surveillance.
    • allows increased information sharing between domestic law enforcement and intelligence, repealing some of the barriers put up in the 1970s after the discovery that the FBI and CIA had been conducting joint investigations on over half a million Americans during the McCarthy era and afterwards, including the Martin Luther King Jr.. It allows wiretap results and grand jury information and other information collected in a criminal case to be disclosed to the intelligence agencies when the information constitutes foreign intelligence or foreign intelligence information, the latter being a broad new category created by this law.



See also


External Links and References

How the USA-PATRIOT Act Permits Indefinite Detention of Immigrants Who Are Not Terrorists, ACLU, October 23, 2001

EFF Analysis Of The Provisions Of The USA PATRIOT Act That Relate To Online Activities, EFF, October 31, 2001