Misplaced Pages

User talk:Verbal/Old01: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Verbal Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:35, 27 May 2009 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 5d) to User talk:Verbal/Archive 2, User talk:Verbal/Archive 3.← Previous edit Revision as of 15:37, 28 May 2009 edit undoVicenarian (talk | contribs)11,582 edits Speedy of the "Enemies List": new sectionNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:


Hi Verbal, (as the creator of the 5-point protocol used in ]), easily meeting ], and I'll write up a stub for him sometime. I ] with our mutual friend ], but not on the article's talk page, which would've been the best place. regards, ] (]) 09:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Hi Verbal, (as the creator of the 5-point protocol used in ]), easily meeting ], and I'll write up a stub for him sometime. I ] with our mutual friend ], but not on the article's talk page, which would've been the best place. regards, ] (]) 09:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

== Speedy of the "Enemies List" ==

Thanks for tagging that for SD. I was hesitant to do so because it was in userspace and it was just a list... but I think you were right to tag it. <font color="blue" face="georgia">]</font> <font face="Georgia"><sup>(] · ])</sup></font> 15:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:37, 28 May 2009


Tempur-Pedic

Hello. The Popular Culture section of Tempur-Pedic was deleted last month, with a comment that the popular culture was trivial. As this brand is often referenced, usually as a parody of their commercials, I believe it is relevant to include this as part of the entry. I've modified the section to only include non-promotional mentions regarding the popularity of that wine glass test commercial, and userfy'd the rewrite in my sandbox. Editors have approved the new version. Thank you for bringing it to my attention Jilliant (talk) 22:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I agree

I was chiefly responsible for this case, and I'm also concerned. The concept was to give him another chance under well-defined conditions. But Guido doesn't seem to have grasped that his community ban was for very real disruption. I'm closely watching this; I hope he moves on very soon. Cool Hand Luke 16:37, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! I hope I haven't made things worse, as I'd like to see things like this work. In WP it seems if something fails once it is banned for all time, and I have a bad feeling about this as a test case. Best, Verbal chat 16:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
I like the theory. I think clear limits would help many banned users. I hope it works out. Cool Hand Luke 17:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Ping

You have mail :-) Dougweller (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't reply? I'm seeing other, similar, problems and it's a shame. I wasn't aware of that one, and it sees to be a hard problem. Verbal chat 21:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Awesome-

ness. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 21:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Never seen that before. Cheers, Verbal chat 21:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Notable

Hi Verbal, Smith is plenty notable (as the creator of the 5-point protocol used in Acupuncture detoxification), easily meeting WP:N, and I'll write up a stub for him sometime. I discussed this with our mutual friend User:BullRangifer, but not on the article's talk page, which would've been the best place. regards, Middle 8 (talk) 09:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy of the "Enemies List"

Thanks for tagging that for SD. I was hesitant to do so because it was in userspace and it was just a list... but I think you were right to tag it. Vicenarian 15:37, 28 May 2009 (UTC)