Revision as of 10:50, 4 June 2009 editShotlandiya (talk | contribs)442 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 4 June 2009 edit undoPõhja Konn (talk | contribs)227 edits →Police brutality: this deserves its own section - that kind of violence is really unheard ofNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Actually there still seems to be a mistake in the name. It's "Mark Sirõk" not Mark Sirők - this article should be moved. Apparently, õ and ő are different letters. ] (]) 16:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | :Actually there still seems to be a mistake in the name. It's "Mark Sirõk" not Mark Sirők - this article should be moved. Apparently, õ and ő are different letters. ] (]) 16:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Moved it..] (]) 06:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ::Moved it..] (]) 06:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | |||
== Police brutality == | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | While looking for the court's ruling, I happened to find a document citing page 22 of it. I never knew how much Sirők had to suffer when, supposedly, he was forced by police to read a history textbook written by Mart Laar for three hours. ]<sub>]</sub> 10:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
⚫ | :Although if this was an Estonian neo-Nazi forced to read a Russian history book I'm sure you'd be complaining. ] (]) 10:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::You surely not suggesting that Digwuren has something to do with or has some feelings against Estonian neo-Nazis? Or why should he complain in that situation? You should be careful with your remarks. | |||
::BTW, reading is generally considered as a good thing, it broadens one's knowledge. And it's very hard to force somebody to read something that he doesn't wish to read. Such an absurd complaint tells a lot about the complaining person. ] (]) 17:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:42, 4 June 2009
Estonia Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think the article deserves speedy deletion. The reason given seems to be that I called the subject a "Russophobe". As I explained in my last edit, this was a spelling mistake. I meant to write "Russophone", which has a completely different meaning, and obviously makes more sense when one reads the article.
I think the subject is notable - a human rights activist who has been cited by various NGOs. No doubt the subject will be controversial, but the article will evolve as more contributions are made and as I pad it out.
Spelling
The lad's name is Mark Sirők, not Siryk. At least have the common decency to spell names right. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 13:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
This is English language Misplaced Pages, not Estonian Misplaced Pages. Please feel free to create an Estonian version of the article with the Estonian version of his name. Shotlandiya (talk) 15:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually there still seems to be a mistake in the name. It's "Mark Sirõk" not Mark Sirők - this article should be moved. Apparently, õ and ő are different letters. H2ppyme (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Moved it..H2ppyme (talk) 06:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Police brutality
While looking for the court's ruling, I happened to find a document citing page 22 of it. I never knew how much Sirők had to suffer when, supposedly, he was forced by police to read a history textbook written by Mart Laar for three hours. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 10:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Although if this was an Estonian neo-Nazi forced to read a Russian history book I'm sure you'd be complaining. Shotlandiya (talk) 10:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- You surely not suggesting that Digwuren has something to do with or has some feelings against Estonian neo-Nazis? Or why should he complain in that situation? You should be careful with your remarks.
- BTW, reading is generally considered as a good thing, it broadens one's knowledge. And it's very hard to force somebody to read something that he doesn't wish to read. Such an absurd complaint tells a lot about the complaining person. Põhja Konn (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2009 (UTC)