| Revision as of 12:52, 5 June 2009 editBalkanian`s word (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers4,434 edits →Thanks: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:34, 5 June 2009 edit undoDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →There is such a thing as "no consensus": new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Thanks for unblocking me. As it seems I have no right to revert anything, according to some in here, even if it is vandalism. Thanks, ] (]) 12:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | Thanks for unblocking me. As it seems I have no right to revert anything, according to some in here, even if it is vandalism. Thanks, ] (]) 12:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == There is such a thing as "no consensus" == | |||
| FYI, per ]: Three Keep votes to two Delete votes is not a consensus to Keep. Each side had arguments, and people argued against claims made by the other side. There was nothing like a consensus to keep. I wish people wouldn't be so quick to act like their own votes are some super consensus overruling what everyone else said. ] (]) 17:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:34, 5 June 2009
User talk:Aitias/archive 9/tph
Deletion of Jeffrey Brent Ball and Todd Ray Wilson
Hello Aitias,
I created these pages on 24 May and you deleted them on 4 June following a discussion leading to their deletion primarily on the basis of the One Event policy. I can see the sense in merging them into one article, such as "The assassinations of Elders Jeffrey Brent Ball and Todd Ray Wilson in La Paz, Bolivia on May 24, 1989," though that title seems a bit lengthy. You probably don't want to deal with the debate, so would you either restore the articles so I can continue working on them, or tell me to create a new article such as the one I suggested in accordance with the consensus of the discussion.
Thank you, Ryan Reeder Ryan Reeder (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for unblocking me. As it seems I have no right to revert anything, according to some in here, even if it is vandalism. Thanks, Balkanian`s word (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
There is such a thing as "no consensus"
FYI, per Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Craig L. Russell (software architect): Three Keep votes to two Delete votes is not a consensus to Keep. Each side had arguments, and people argued against claims made by the other side. There was nothing like a consensus to keep. I wish people wouldn't be so quick to act like their own votes are some super consensus overruling what everyone else said. DreamGuy (talk) 17:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)