| Revision as of 09:32, 5 June 2009 view sourceDweller (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Oversighters, Administrators55,876 edits →Disruptive editing: DNFTT← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 6 June 2009 view source JGGardiner (talk | contribs)2,725 edits →challenge to wikifan12345Next edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| ::You are counting that as a signature just because I posted here? Does that mean that your signature counts also? --] (]) 21:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ::You are counting that as a signature just because I posted here? Does that mean that your signature counts also? --] (]) 21:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::Yes and no. If and when my signature is included that will be my last edit to this site. ] (]) 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | :::Yes and no. If and when my signature is included that will be my last edit to this site. ] (]) 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Okay so the count is, me, FfQ, Untwirl and of course Wikifan him/herself. So it is getting up there. And don't forget that your boss also wants you off of WP. --] (]) 00:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| can we start a section on users who want nableezy's ](the australian version)? i'll sign that one! ](]) 16:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | can we start a section on users who want nableezy's ](the australian version)? i'll sign that one! ](]) 16:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :you just signed this one, i wont take it personally though, my cone is full ] (]) 16:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | :you just signed this one, i wont take it personally though, my cone is full ] (]) 16:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 6 June 2009
Template:Archive box collapsible
Michael Jordan userbox
How do you get the Michael Jordan userbox? CollisionCourse (talk) 09:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- The userbox is {{User:Paulinho28/MJ}} Nableezy (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the info. CollisionCourse (talk) 21:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
challenge to wikifan12345
Since he is sure he "could find 20 users who want Nableezy gone" I ask him to do so. If you would like me to leave please sign your name below. Good luck wikifan Nableezy (talk) 20:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Me!!! -Falastine fee Qalby (talk) 21:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC) I am kidding
Is there a time limit on this? Obviously I wouldn't want to make such an important decision without thinking it through. --JGGardiner (talk) 09:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- you have already made your decision, these 2 are binding signatures. Making it a lil easier on WF. Nableezy (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- You are counting that as a signature just because I posted here? Does that mean that your signature counts also? --JGGardiner (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes and no. If and when my signature is included that will be my last edit to this site. Nableezy (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay so the count is, me, FfQ, Untwirl and of course Wikifan him/herself. So it is getting up there. And don't forget that your boss also wants you off of WP. --JGGardiner (talk) 00:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes and no. If and when my signature is included that will be my last edit to this site. Nableezy (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- You are counting that as a signature just because I posted here? Does that mean that your signature counts also? --JGGardiner (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
can we start a section on users who want nableezy's cone(the australian version)? i'll sign that one! untwirl(talk) 16:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- you just signed this one, i wont take it personally though, my cone is full Nableezy (talk) 16:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- damn, i was high and fucked that up. can i refactor and start my new section, bob? (not wanting to miss out on that cone) untwirl(talk) 16:53, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Bless young and ignorant
Nothing new under the sun, isn't it? There was something before Durban 1 and 2, it was called United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379. It condemned Zionism and equaled it to apartheid, racism and colonialism. Not sure you are familiar. But if you do - forget it. Regards. --Sceptic Ashdod (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- yes I was. FYI, Im done with that page for a while, just too aggravating. Stay well, Nableezy (talk) 15:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- I liked what you did today, especially removing that horrible Cryptonio sentence 'Since the team entered ...'. Aren't you afraid of Cryptonio's aggravations? I hope you don't, but if you do - I'll try to back you up. Your addition to the 'occupation' sentence hurts, but it is true, so no objection there. I placed 2 more pictures of Rayyan on a talk page, choose whatever you seem appropriate and insert it in the infobox (I'd like to keep the original in the article too, but something says me you might oppose this). Ah, those pictures need appropriate tag, your help would be appreciated. They are taken from PALD public forum, so there shouldn't be a problem. Regards. --Sceptic Ashdod (talk) 07:36, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
| collapse inanity |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Deleting content based on grammatical concerns is considered disruptive editing. I request that you self revert this edit, and fix the content to be written in a manner that resolves your grammar concerns.
|
Of course the BBC is a RS. So is the JP. However, the names have to mentioned in order to manifest the contradiction. Read the paragraph according to your edit. The whole point doesn't jive. Best, --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh, I see. I just saw the 'according to the BBC.' fixed. Also, quick note here, your 'refuses to archive' problem was that the bot requires 2 signatures to archive, anything with just 1 will stay. Nableezy (talk) 18:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- what do you mean "two signatures"?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- You mean it requires some sort of reply?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, if there is only one signature (with a timestamp) in a section it will skip over that. Nableezy (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- So what am I supposed to when some troll crawls his way to my talkpage (i.e. User talk:Brewcrewer#well, why don't... with some comment that doesn't even merit removal?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- either archive it manually or write "to archive" with your sig. or do what i do, just make fun of them for saying something dumb. but really, why dont you ... :) Nableezy (talk) 19:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- So what am I supposed to when some troll crawls his way to my talkpage (i.e. User talk:Brewcrewer#well, why don't... with some comment that doesn't even merit removal?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yup, if there is only one signature (with a timestamp) in a section it will skip over that. Nableezy (talk) 18:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- You mean it requires some sort of reply?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- what do you mean "two signatures"?--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 18:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Chaps, you might already have seen this, but it's always worth rereading WP:DNFTT. --Dweller (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)