Misplaced Pages

2006 Canadian federal election: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:20, 28 November 2005 edit63.202.158.108 (talk) Background← Previous edit Revision as of 00:03, 29 November 2005 edit undo65.49.152.201 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
Recent political events, most notably testimony from the ] investigating the ], have been perceived to have weakened the governing ] by alleging widespread corruption and criminal behaviour in the party. While ] ] had committed in April 2005 to dissolve Parliament within a month of the tabling of the second Gomery Report (now schueduled for February 1, 2006), all three ] represented in the ]—the ], ] and ] (NDP)—have announced that they no longer intend to wait until then. Recent political events, most notably testimony from the ] investigating the ], have been perceived to have weakened the governing ] by alleging widespread corruption and criminal behaviour in the party. While ] ] had committed in April 2005 to dissolve Parliament within a month of the tabling of the second Gomery Report (now schueduled for February 1, 2006), all three ] represented in the ]—the ], ] and ] (NDP)—have announced that they no longer intend to wait until then.


] ] introduced a ] on ], which is to be voted upon starting at 6:30 pm (EST) ]. NDP leader ], seconded the motion. With the confirmed backing of all three opposition parties, this motion will likely result in an election in the second or third week of January following a campaign spanning the holiday season. ] ] introduced a ] on ], which is to be voted upon starting at 6:30 pm (EST) ]. NDP leader ], seconded the motion. The motion passed on November 28th, 2005, with all MPs from the NDP, Bloc Quebecois, and Conservatives voting with a combined 171 votes for. An election will be called on November 29th.


==Background== ==Background==

Revision as of 00:03, 29 November 2005

Template:Future election

Federal elections and referendums in Canada
General elections
By-elections
Referendums

The 2006 Canadian federal election (more formally, the 39th general election) will almost certainly be held on January 16 or 23, 2006. Although law requires only that the election must be held by 2009, a minority government has allowed opposition pressure to shorten the lifespan of the 38th parliament substantially.

Recent political events, most notably testimony from the Gomery Commission investigating the sponsorship scandal, have been perceived to have weakened the governing Liberals by alleging widespread corruption and criminal behaviour in the party. While Prime Minister Paul Martin had committed in April 2005 to dissolve Parliament within a month of the tabling of the second Gomery Report (now schueduled for February 1, 2006), all three opposition parties represented in the House of Commons—the Conservatives, Bloc Québécois and New Democratic Party (NDP)—have announced that they no longer intend to wait until then.

Opposition leader Stephen Harper introduced a motion of no confidence on November 24, which is to be voted upon starting at 6:30 pm (EST) November 28. NDP leader Jack Layton, seconded the motion. The motion passed on November 28th, 2005, with all MPs from the NDP, Bloc Quebecois, and Conservatives voting with a combined 171 votes for. An election will be called on November 29th.

Background

An early election is likely because the 2004 federal election held on June 28, 2004, resulted in the election of a Liberal minority government. In the past, minority governments have had an average lifespan of a year and a half. Some pundits consider the current minority to be particularly unstable. It involves four' parties, and only very implausible ideological combinations (e.g. Liberals + Conservatives; Liberals + Bloc Québécois; Conservatives + Bloc Québécois + NDP) could actually command a majority of the seats, a necessity if a government is to retain power. From its earliest moments, there was some threat of the government falling as even the Speech from the Throne almost resulted in a non-confidence vote.

File:Paulmartin1.jpg
Paul Martin, Canada's Prime Minister, and leader of the Liberals
File:Harpes.jpg
Stephen Harper, Leader of the Official Opposition of Canada, and the leader of the Conservatives
File:Jacklaytonsmall.jpg
Jack Layton, the leader of the NDP
Gilles Duceppe, the leader of the Bloc Québécois
File:JimHarris.jpg
Jim Harris, Leader of the Green Party of Canada

Brinkmanship in the spring of 2005

The parliament came close to falling when testimony from the Gomery Commission caused public opinion to move sharply against the government. The Bloc Québécois were eager from the beginning to have an early election. The Conservatives announced they had also lost confidence in the government's moral authority. Thus, during much of spring 2005, there was a widespread belief that the Liberals would lose a confidence vote, prompting an election taking place in the spring or summer of 2005.

In a televised speech on April 21, Martin promised to request a dissolution of Parliament and begin an election campaign within 30 days of the Gomery Commission’s final report. The release date of that report would later solidify as February 1, 2006; Martin then clarified that he intended to schedule the election call so as to have the polling day in April 2006.

Later that week, the NDP, who had initially opposed the budget, opted to endorse Martin's proposal for a later election. The Liberals agreed to take corporate tax cuts out of the budget on April 26 in exchange for NDP support on votes of confidence, but even with NDP support the Liberals still fell three votes short of a majority. However, a surprise defection of former Conservative leadership candidate Belinda Stronach to the Liberal party on May 17 changed the balance of power in the House. Independents Chuck Cadman and Carolyn Parrish provided the last two votes needed for the Liberals to win the budget vote.

The deal turned out to be rather unnecessary, as the Conservatives opted to ensure the government's survival on the motion of confidence surrounding the original budget, expressing support to the tax cuts and defence spending therein. When Parliament voted on second reading and referral of the budget and the amendment on May 19, the previous events kept the government alive. The original budget bill, C-43, passed easily, as expected, but the amendment bill, C-48, resulted in an equality of votes, and the Speaker of the House broke the tie to continue the parliament. The government never got as close to falling after that date. Third reading of Bill C-48 was held late at night on an unexpected day, and several Conservatives being absent, the motion passed easily, guaranteeing there would be no election in the near future.

Aftermath of the first Gomery report

On November 1, John Gomery released his interim report, and the scandal returned to prominence. Liberal support again fell, with some polls registering an immediate ten percent drop. The Conservatives and Bloc thus resumed their push for an election before Martin's April date. The NDP stated that their support was contingent on the Liberals agreeing to move against the private provision of healthcare. The Liberals and NDP failed to come to an agreement, however, and the NDP joined the two other opposition parties in demanding an election.

However, the Liberals had intentionally scheduled the mandatory "opposition days" (where a specified opposition party controls the agenda) on November 15 (Conservative), November 17 (Bloc Québécois) and November 24 (NDP). These days meant that any election would come over the Christmas season, an unpopular idea. Following negotiations between the opposition parties, they instead issued an ultimatum to the Prime Minister to call an election immediately after the Christmas holidays or face an immediate non-confidence vote which would prompt a holiday-spanning campaign.

To that end, the NDP introduced a parliamentary motion demanding that the government drop the writ in January 2006 for a February 13 election date; however, only the prime minister has the authority to do so, not Parliament, so any such motion cannot be legally binding. Martin had indicated that he remained committed to his April 2006 date, and would disregard the motion, which the opposition parties managed to pass, as expected, on November 21 by a vote of 167-129.

The three opposition leaders had agreed to delay the tabling of the no-confidence motion until the 24th, to ensure that a conference between the government and the aboriginal leaders scheduled on the 24th would not be disrupted by the campaign. Parliamentary procedure dictated that the vote be deferred until the 28th.

Potential polling dates

It is expected that upon losing confidence, the Prime Minister would immediately ask the Governor-General to drop the writ, and declare an election for early January. Canadian elections can take place no earlier than 36 days after the writ is dropped, and most recently, elections have taken place on the earliest possible Monday, in this case January 9, 2006. However, the polling day will almost certainly be delayed slightly, as the campaign will be largely paused for several days over Christmas. Currently January 16 and January 23 are considered the two most likely dates. Even if the opposition refuses to put forward the non-confidence motion, the government would still be expected to fall: there is a vote on supplementary budget estimates on December 8, and if it loses, loss of supply will topple the Liberals, resulting in an election no earlier than January 16, 2006.

The election, if held, would involve the same 308 electoral districts as in 2004, except in New Brunswick, where the boundaries of Acadie—Bathurst were deemed illegal. Many of the candidates would also be the same. Fewer incumbents would choose to leave than if they had served a full term, and the parties have generally blocked challenges to sitting MPs for the duration of the minority government although there are some exceptions.

In addition to the four sitting parties (three of whom run nationally), the Green Party of Canada intends to again run candidates in all 308 districts. Though no Green candidate has yet been elected in Canada, the party, once viewed as a fringe movement in Canadian politics, has made significant gains in recent polls.

Issues

Issues that are likely to play a major role in the 2006 election, from most important to least:

Sponsorship scandal

This issue continues to be a hindrance for the governing Liberals. The Liberals are currently being attacked and will undoubtedly continue to be hammered by the opposition on this issue, particularly by the Conservatives and Bloc Québécois, especially after inquiry hearings in early 2005. Recent testimony has intensified the debate and strengthened the opposition, as new and sharp details have come out in the Gomery Commission. It will likely be the #1 issue in the next election. An April 14 CBC poll showed it and government leadership as being the top election issue, even ahead of health care.

Health care

This is a perennial top issue in Canada. In previous election campaigns both the Liberal Party, and the NDP have heavily campaigned to be seen as protectors of Canada's Medicare system. The new Conservative Party, and its predecessors have campaigned on "fixing" the Medicare system in various ways, but have remained quiet on the issue (in comparison with the other two federal parties). Many on the political right support a two-tier health care system which would provide private health service for those willing (and able) to pay; though the Conservative party is officially against two-tier health care. The Conservative Party and the Bloc Quebecois also supprt devolving complete jurisdiction on heath care to the provinces (as originally designated in the BNA Act) which many see as a back door way towards privatization. The left opposes the increase of for-profit influence in the healthcare system, and often claims that healthcare is an essential service, and should be equally availiable to all Canadians regardless of ability to pay. On the other hand the left wing and especially the NDP have been criticized at times as using socialized medicine to stir up "class war" feelings in the electorate.

Social Issues

Though Canada's generally liberal social policies have enjoyed fairly consistent levels of support in the last decade, there are criticisms from the "Christian Right" and other conservative groups, especially in the rural areas, that Canada's policies on abortion and same-sex marriage have become far too liberal. However, when the same-sex marriage bill passed on June 28, 2005 polls done by CTV and Ipsos-Reid showed the majority of Canadians support the legislation. The latest poll, released in July of 2005, pegged support for gay marriage at 55%, opposition at 39%, and 6% undecided. These numbers were not broken down as per level of opposition/support nor the necessary invoking of the Notwithstanding Clause, which would be required to revert to the traditional definition.

On 9 December 2004, when the Supreme Court of Canada released its reference opinion agreeing with gay marriage, 71% said they supported the concept of gay marriage in some form: 39% said gay marriage should be fully recognized and equal to conventional heterosexual marriages; 32% believe it should be allowed to exist in civil law, but not have the same legal weight, while only 29% believed it should never be lawful - 56% of Albertans were opposed in this poll. A poll released months earlier from Ipsos-Reid found that if same-sex marriage was the sole issue driving an election, the Liberals would prevail as the winner. In terms of top election issues, gay marriage consistently, according to polls, have been at only 6% or less on the top of Canadians minds. Health care remains the top priority, along with government accountability. Belinda Stronach cited the Conservative stance on social issues among her reasons for crossing the floor to the Liberals in May 2005, while Pat O'Brien cited the Liberal position when he left the Liberals in June 2005.

Most Conservatives oppose legal recognition of same-sex marriage, although 26% of Conservative Delegates at the 2005 Biennial Convention voted in favor of same-sex marriage. While the Liberals endorsed same-sex marriage as party policy, many members disagree (a few strongly). Most of the Bloc Québécois and most New Democrats are strong supporters of same-sex marriage.

Despite expected Liberal attack ads to the contrary, the Conservative Party rejected many calls to restrict abortions during their 2005 convention, although a large pro-life caucus means that individual members may bring the issue up again. Their post-convention policy document states that "a Conservative Government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion." The Liberals are somewhat divided on abortion, although with far more support of abortion rights than opposition. The Bloc and NDP are staunchly pro-choice.

Another potential issue will be the fact that at their last convention the Liberal party adopted the legalization of prostitution as an official policy, which is strongly opposed by most Conservatives and some Liberals, but supported by the NDP.

Taxation

The Conservatives propose to lower taxes significantly. They believe that this would stimulate the economy. In 2004, the Conservatives promised to end "corporate welfare" and replace it with tax cuts for all businesses. The Liberals, the Bloc Québécois and the NDP opposed large tax cuts, and argued that money should instead be spent to improve social programs. The Green Party runs on a fiscally conservative platform of what it calls a "green tax shift", which would see taxes lowered for small businesses and families, and raised for polluters and heavy resource users. Huge surpluses ($9.1 billion in 2004) have increased Canadians' appetites for tax cuts.

The 2005 budget originally implemented relatively modest tax cuts which have been criticized by both the right and left. (Parties, major and minor, from the center to the right demanded much greater tax relief, including support for families raising children at home from the Conservatives; parties from the center to the left, including the NDP, believed corporations and higher-income Canadians should have to pay higher taxes.) However, a later agreement between the Liberals and NDP rescinded the tax cuts, was praised by the left, but demonized by the right (especially business leaders).

An upcoming economic statement (touted as a "mini-budget") will likely include new tax cuts, although it is unlikely that such will find much support as Conservatives will view it as a vote-buying attempt, and it will lose support from the NDP and Bloc who oppose tax cuts.

The rise of high-yield income trusts is also an electoral issue. Starting in 2002, several large Canadian companies converted into income trusts in order to avoid double taxation and reduce or eliminate their income tax payments, making the trust sector the fastest-growing in Canada in 2005. Conversions were almost halted in September 2005 when Finance Minister Ralph Goodale suspended advance tax rulings on trusts, drawing tremendous criticism from powerful pension funds and investment banks. Trust activity resumed in November when the Department of Finance announced, several weeks ahead of schedule, that the trusts would not be taxed and that a dividend tax credit would be introduced to match the trust advantage. The move was applauded by financial circles at the same time as it was critized as a last-minute vote-buying attempt.

Fiscal imbalance

All major parties except the federal Liberals claim that there is a fiscal imbalance between Ottawa and the provinces and speak of plans to reduce it. The Bloc Québécois is the most vocal party on this issue. Several provincial governments, most notably Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty and Quebec Premier Jean Charest, have also spoken out on the issue.

Canada-United States relations

This issue has divided Canada more than ever since the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Most Conservatives believe that closer relations with the United States (such as a North American security perimeter and deeper integration through NAFTA) are necessary for economic and political reasons. Most of the Bloc and NDP believe that Canada needs to move away from the United States, especially with the re-election of President Bush in 2004. The Liberals are deeply split, with many on each side.

The Americans' rejection of NAFTA's final ruling in Canada's favour in the U.S.-Canada softwood lumber dispute on August 10, 2005 has raised questions about if and how Canada will retaliate. The future shape of free trade will likely be an important issue if it is not resolved by the election.

In the west issues such as BSE, and Argriculural Tariffs have inspired anti-US feelings.

In addition, the Bush administration in the United States wants Canada to openly join the National Missile Defense program (currently Canada participates in some parts of the shield). The Conservatives are open to negotiating the issue with the USA, while the Bloc, the NDP, the Green Party and many Liberals strongly oppose it. Prime Minister Martin announced in February 2005 that Canada will not join the missile shield; this has upset some Liberals who supported missile defence.

Environment

The Liberal government has been critized by several parties for its policies on environmental matters. Criticism has been expressed by all other parties regarding the Liberal party's management of Canada's carbon dioxide emissions, and how Canada will meet its obligations to the Kyoto Protocol. Other environmental issues such as water quality in Aboriginal communities have received attention.

Parliamentary reform

The Conservatives accused the Liberals of perpetuating "undemocratic practices" in Parliament, by limiting the powers of MPs. Martin called for some reform, but it never materialized. The Conservatives promised an elected Senate and standing committee and provincial review of judicial appointments. The NDP and the Bloc spoke of abolishing the Canadian Senate - all parties claim to want to reform it. The appointments of nine Senators on March 24, 2005 intensified the debate, it has angered many Conservatives, especially in Alberta.

Electoral reform

The Conservatives promised fixed election dates and a review of the electoral system. The NDP and the Green Party promote the idea of proportional representation voting -- the NDP and Green parties win a considerably smaller proportion of seats in the House of Commons than of the popular vote under the current first past the post system. Meanwhile, one referendum in British Columbia in May 2005 nearly succeeded in requiring single transferable vote in future provincial elections, and another referendum will be held in November 2005 in Prince Edward Island on using mixed proportional representation. Ontario is also considering such reforms, as is Quebec. Changes at the provincial level will put pressure on the federal government to make similar changes.

Gun registry

Most Conservatives strongly oppose the gun registry, while the other parties generally support it. The Conservatives promise to scrap the long-gun registry (handguns and restricted firearms would remain registered) and introduce tougher gun-related crime laws, including minimum sentencing for gun crimes. A few Liberal backbenchers have spoken against the registry; however, they are overwhelmed by the party support.

Parliamentary stability

One small potential factor could be parliamentary stability; polls consistently show that any new election would likely result in another minority government, either Liberal-led or Conservative-led, and that would likely lead to another election in 2007. Voter fatigue could become a major problem.

Minor party positions

Further information: Canadian federal election, minor party positions

Opinion polls

Ipsos-Reid polling chart
Decima Research polling chart
Strategic Counsel polling chart

In the wake of Jean Brault's testimony at the Gomery Commission and its release on April 7, several polls were commissioned to gauge the fallout for the Liberals. The results of these polls showed a dip in support for the Liberals which encouraged the Conservatives to seek an early election by tabling a non-confidence motion. However, Liberal support has recovered following an agreement with the NDP to support some changes to the budget and a number of incidents involving Conservative MP Gurmant Grewal that hurt the Conservatives. Consistently since the Brault testimony the polls have indicated that an election would result in an increase in the number of seats for the Bloc and NDP, and cyclical gains and losses for the Conservative Party inversely to the Liberal Party.

In November, the first report by Justice John Gomery was released to the public. Subsequently, once again, the poll numbers for the Liberals have dropped. However, just days later, a new poll (see Strategic Counsel - November 6) shows the Liberals are already bouncing back. Most public opinion polls show that Canadians still, by at least 60%, don't want an election until after the second Gomery report is released in February. Latest polls show overwhelmingly Canadians feel Jean Chretien was responsible for the scandal, but that the Prime Minister still needs to accept responsibility -- it is this 'accepting responsibility' that Canadians seem unsure of at this point.

The dates listed are normally the date the survey was concluded. Most news and political affairs sources use the convention of using the last date that the poll was conducted in order to establish the inclusion/exclusion of current events. Last updated: November 28, 2005 - 06:08PM EDT


Polling Firm Date Link Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberal|File:Lpcsmall.jpgLiberal Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Conservative|File:Cpcsmall.jpgCons. Template:Canadian politics/party colours/NDP|File:Ndpsmall.jpgNDP Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BQ|File:Bqsmall.jpgBQ Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green|File:Gpcsmall.jpgGreen
Pollara November 27 36 31 16 -
Ekos November 24 39 29 17 11 04
Ipsos-Reid November 24 34 30 16 15 05
Ipsos-Reid November 15 36 27 16 13 06
Decima Research November 14 33 26 22 13 -
Pollara November 13 36 28 20 -
SES Research November 13 34 28 20 -
Ipsos-Reid November 10 34 28 19 14 04
Ekos November 09 33 28 21 13 05
Leger Marketing November 08 34 26 18 11 07
Decima Research November 07 33 30 20 14 -
Strategic Counsel November 06 35 28 16 13 08
Strategic Counsel November 03 28 31 20 13 07
Ipsos-Reid November 02 31 30 19 13 05
SES Research October 27 40 28 15 12 04
Ipsos-Reid October 27 38 26 18 11 05
Pollara October 17 38 30 17 - -
Decima Research October 17 35 29 17 13 -
Environics October 16 38 27 20 10 -
Strategic Counsel October 13 PDF 38 25 15 14 -
Pollara October 02 36 30 19 11 -
Ipsos-Reid September 29 37 27 17 14 04
Decima Research September 26 36 29 17 13 -
Praxicus September 23 33 29 20 - -
Strategic Counsel September 13 35 28 17 13 07
Leger Marketing September 11 PDF 40 24 15 13 5
Ipsos-Reid August 22 36 28 17 11 06
SES Research August 15 PDF 39 25 19 13 -
Strategic Counsel August 15 36 28 17 - -
Environics July 28 Info 34 31 20 11 -
Decima Research July 25 PDF 39 24 19 14 -
Pollara July 18 38 27 15 13 -
Strategic Counsel July 16 35 26 19 13 07
Pollara June 28 36 29 18 11 -
Ipsos-Reid June 28 35 27 18 13 06
Decima Research June 23 PDF 37 25 20 13 -
Ipsos-Reid June 20 34 29 16 12 06
Strategic Counsel June 11 34 26 19 13 09
Decima Research June 08 37 23 21 13 -
Pollara June 06 38 27 19 13 -
Leger Marketing May 26 38 27 17 - -
Decima Research May 26 PDF 36 27 21 13 -
Ipsos-Reid May 20 34 28 17 - 06-
EKOS May 19 34.7 28.3 18.4 12.6 -
COMPAS May 19 29 38 17 13 -
Strategic Counsel May 18 33 30 19 12 06
Environics May 17 33 31 22 10 -
Decima Research May 17 PDF 32 31 19 14 -
Ipsos-Reid May 14 27 31 19 13 06
Decima Research May 10 PDF 37 28 18 12 -
Strategic Counsel May 10 27 31 20 14 07
Ipsos-Reid May 07 32 31 16 12 05
SES Research May 05 36.1 29.5 17.9 12.2 04.3
Pollara May 04 31 36 17 15 -
Decima Research May 03 PDF 32 29 20 15 -
Ekos April 30 32.5 30.5 19 12 05.5
Ipsos-Reid April 30 30 33 17 12 05
GPC P.A. April 28 33 30 13 13 10
Strategic Counsel April 28 30 28 18 16 10
Ipsos-Reid April 26 31 34 18 11 05
Decima Research April 25 PDF 27 32 21 15 -
Ipsos-Reid April 22 30 35 18 12 05
Pollara April 21 31 35 18 12 -
Decima Research April 21 28 35 18 14 -
SES Research April 18 31.6 37.9 14.9 11.9 03.8
COMPAS April 16 30 34 18 15 01
Ipsos-Reid April 15 27 36 15 10 02
Environics April 14 27 33 24 11 2
Environics April 12 36 30 19 11 4
Ipsos-Reid April 12 27 30 19 12 7
Ekos April 11 25.0 36.2 20.5 12.6 5.0
Ipsos-Reid April 09 34 30 15 10 -
Last election June 28, 2004 36.7 29.6 15.7 12.4 04.3


  1. This Compas poll was taken over the course of a single day.
  2. Polling for this data mostly occurred before Jean Brault's Gomery Inquiry testimony was released.

Party Standings at dissolution

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Blank/row
Party Party leader # of
candidates
Seats Popular Vote
2004 Current Elected % Change # % Change

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Liberal/row

Liberal Paul Martin 308 135 133          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Conservative/row

Conservative Stephen Harper 308 99 98          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/BQ/row

Bloc Québécois Gilles Duceppe 75 54 53          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/NDP/row

New Democratic Jack Layton 308 19 18          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Green/row

Green Jim Harris 308? - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Christian Heritage/row

Christian Heritage Ron Gray - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Marijuana/row

Marijuana Blair Longley - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Progressive Conservatives/row

Progressive Canadian Tracy Parsons - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Marxist-Leninist/row

Marxist-Leninist Sandra L. Smith - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Canadian Action/row

Canadian Action Connie Fogal - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Communist/row

Communist Miguel Figueroa - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Libertarian/row

Libertarian Jean-Serge Brisson - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Western Canada Concept/row

Western Block Doug Christie - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Social Credit/row

Animal Alliance Liz White - - -          

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Independents/row

Independent - 1 4          
Vacant 2  
Total   308 308 308 -   100%  
Sources: http://www.elections.ca -- History of Federal Ridings since 1867

Notes:

Candidates

Targets

The term "Targets" is used often in the UK and Australia, although not in Canada. In those nations, it represents the ridings in which parties came closest to being elected without winning. Winning party shown in brackets. Up to 20 are shown, with a maximum margin of victory of 15%.

* Indicates incumbent not running again

File:Lib-can.png File:Cpoclogo.jpg
  1. Simcoe—Grey, ON (Cons) 0.2%
  2. Cambridge, ON (Cons) 0.4%
  3. Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK (Cons) 0.4%
  4. Kildonan—St. Paul, MB (Cons) 0.8%
  5. Burnaby—New Westminster, BC (NDP) 0.8%
  6. Newton—North Delta, BC (Cons) 1.2%
  7. Saskatoon—Humboldt, SK (Cons) 1.2%
  8. Newmarket—Aurora, ON (Lib) 1.3% (Cons. MP Belinda Stronach later joined the Libs.)
  9. Niagara West—Glanbrook, ON (Cons) 1.3%
  10. Essex, ON (Cons) 1.6%
  11. Timmins—James Bay, ON (NDP) 1.8%
  12. Sault Ste. Marie, ON (NDP) 1.8%
  13. Chicoutimi—Le Fjord, QC (BQ) 1.9%
  14. Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia, MB (Cons) 1.9%
  15. Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou, QC (BQ) 2.0%
  16. Burnaby—Douglas, BC (NDP) 2.1%
  17. Niagara Falls, ON (Cons) 2.2%
  18. Halifax, NS (NDP) 2.4%
  19. Durham, ON (Cons) 2.4%
  20. Oshawa, ON (Cons) 2.7%
  1. Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, AB (Lib) 0.3%*
  2. Lambton—Kent—Middlesex, ON (Lib) 0.3%*
  3. Northumberland—Quinte West, ON (Lib) 0.6%
  4. Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON (Lib) 0.9%*
  5. Edmonton Centre, AB (Lib) 1.4%
  6. Ottawa West—Nepean, ON (Lib) 2.4%*
  7. Barrie, ON (Lib) 2.6%
  8. North Vancouver, BC (Lib) 3.6%
  9. Ottawa—Orléans, ON (Lib) 4.7%
  10. Brant, ON (Lib) 5.0%
  11. Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale, ON (Lib) 5.1%
  12. Nipissing—Timiskaming, ON (Lib) 5.2%
  13. Brampton West, ON (Lib) 5.3%
  14. Burnaby—New Westminster, BC (NDP) 5.4%
  15. Hamilton Mountain, ON (Lib) 5.5%*
  16. Simcoe North, ON (Lib) 5.7%*
  17. St. Catharines, ON (Lib) 5.7%
  18. Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor, NL (Lib) 6.6%
  19. Burlington, ON (Lib) 6.7%
  20. Kitchener—Conestoga, ON (Lib) 6.9%
File:Bloc Quebecois 2004 Logo.png File:CA NDP 2004 Logo.png
  1. Jeanne-Le Ber, QC (Lib) 0.2%
  2. Papineau, QC (Lib) 1.1%
  3. Gatineau, QC (Lib) 1.8%
  4. Brome—Missisquoi, QC (Lib) 2.4%
  5. Ahuntsic, QC (Lib) 2.5%
  6. Brossard—La Prairie, QC (Lib) 4.9%
  7. Beauce, QC (Lib) 5.1%
  8. Honoré-Mercier, QC (Lib) 5.7%
  9. Outremont, QC (Lib) 7.7%
  10. Pontiac, QC (Lib) 9.2%
  11. Hull—Aylmer, QC (Lib) 9.4%
  12. Laval—Les Îles, QC (Lib) 10.8%
  13. Bourassa, QC (Lib) 12.2%
  1. Western Arctic, NT (Lib) 0.3%
  2. New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC (Cons) 0.3%
  3. Palliser, SK (Cons) 0.4%
  4. Vancouver Island North, BC (Cons) 0.9%
  5. Oshawa, ON (Cons) 1.0%
  6. Saskatoon—Humboldt, SK (Cons) 1.1%
  7. British Columbia Southern Interior, BC (Cons) 1.5%*
  8. Trinity—Spadina, ON (Lib) 1.6%
  9. Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON (Lib) 1.9%
  10. Hamilton Mountain, ON (Lib) 1.9%
  11. Vancouver Kingsway, BC (Lib) 3.1%
  12. Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK (Cons) 3.1%
  13. Newton—North Delta, BC (Cons) 3.6%
  14. Victoria, BC (Lib) 3.9%*
  15. Kenora, ON (Lib) 4.1%
  16. Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, BC (Lib) 4.7%
  17. Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission, BC (Cons) 5.8%
  18. Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK (Cons) 6.4%
  19. Nanaimo—Alberni, BC (Cons) 6.8%
  20. Parkdale—High Park, ON (Lib) 7.6%

Cabinet ministers who won by less than 5% in 2004

  1. Liza Frulla, Canadian Heritage: 0.2% over BQ in Jeanne-Le Ber, QC
  2. Ethel Blondin-Andrew, Northern Development: 0.3% over NDP in Western Arctic, NT
  3. Pierre Pettigrew, Foreign Affairs: 1.1% over BQ in Papineau, QC
  4. Belinda Stronach, Human Resources and Skills Development: 1.3% over Lib in Newmarket—Aurora, ON; elected as a Conservative, Stronach defected to the Liberals on May 17, 2005.
  5. Anne McLellan, Deputy PM/Public Safety: 1.4% over Cons. in Edmonton Centre, AB
  6. Tony Valeri, House Leader, 1.9% over NDP in Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON
  7. Aileen Carroll, International Cooperation, 2.6% over Cons. in Barrie, ON
  8. David Emerson, Industry, 3.1% over NDP in Vancouver Kingsway, BC
  9. Jacques Saada, Quebec Economic Development, 4.9% over BQ in Brossard—La Prairie, QC

Incumbent MPs not running for re-election

Liberals

Conservatives

New Democrats

Bloc Québécois MPs

Independents

Timeline

2004

  • November 18 - Outspoken Liberal MP Carolyn Parrish is dismissed from the Liberal caucus by Prime Minister Martin for making statements critical of the Liberal Party and the prime minister. She now sits as an independent.

2005

File:Davidkilgour.JPG
David Kilgour
  • April 11 - *An EKOS/Toronto Star poll shows the Conservatives leading the Liberals 36% to 25%. This is the first time since before the 1993 election that a party has led the Liberals by more than the margin of error.
  • April 13 - David Kilgour leaves the Liberal caucus to sit as an independent. Kilgour who was originally elected as a Progressive Conservative in the 1979 election says he will not run as a Conservative in the next election.
  • April 21 - Prime Minister Paul Martin addresses the nation at 19:02 eastern time and promises to call an election within 30 days of the final report of the Gomery Commission, due on December 15, should his government survive to that date, while outlining the steps his administration has taken to address the sponsorship scandal. Following this, each of the three opposition party leaders respond live following Martin's taped address. The NDP's Jack Layton offers to support the government, which, with the close numbers in the House of Commons would make the survival of the government possible but not certain, if Martin will remove corporate tax cuts from the budget. Opposition Leader Stephen Harper suggests an election is likely but not certain while Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe unequivocally supports an immediate election.
File:PaulMartinAddressingCanadians.jpg
Paul Martin addressing Canadians
  • April 26 - An agreement in principle between the Liberals and the NDP is reached under which tax cuts for large corporations will be deferred but those for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME's) will remain. The deferred tax cuts will be introduced later in a separate bill, while budget surpluses will be used to fund mutual Liberal and NDP priorities such as: training, post-secondary education, foreign aid, affordable housing and the environment. Under the agreement, the NDP will support the government on any confidence motions until the budget receives Royal Assent.
  • May 10 - The House of Commons passes, by a margin of 153 to 150, a Conservative motion which called upon the House Public Accounts committee to "recommand that the government resign because of its failure to address the deficiencies in governance of the public service". Conservative and Bloc Québécois MPs voted in favor of the motion against the Liberals, the NDP and two independent MPs. Liberal House Leader Tony Valeri maintained that the vote was not a matter of confidence while all opposition parties, including the NDP though it sided with the government on the vote, said that it was. The government loses four more similar votes over the next two days.
  • May 11 - Prime Minister Martin calls for a vote on the budget implementation bill on May 19, he suggests that this will be the time that the House will determine whether or not it has confidence in his government. Some contitutional experts had suggested such a move should be taken as the confidence issue was unceratin.
File:Belinda stronach.jpg
Belinda Stronach
File:Chuck Cadman.jpg
Chuck Cadman
  • May 19 - The budget implementation bills, both matters of confidence, pass the House of Commons. The first bill, on the original budget, passed without opposition by the Conservative Party as a gesture of support for the Atlantic Accord. The second bill, which implemented the April 26 deal between the Liberal Party and the NDP, resulted in a tie vote which was broken in favor of the government by the Speaker of the House. Independent MP David Kilgour voted against the bill, and Independent MP Chuck Cadman voted in favour. This is the first time in Canadian history that the Speaker of the House has broken a tie on a matter of confidence.
  • May 24 - Liberal Todd Russell wins a by-election held in Labrador, winning with a reduced majority. Surprisingly for a by-election, turnout is significantly increased over the 2004 general election. Although there is now one more Liberal in the House, the government will still need the support of the NDP and two of the three independents in order to survive future confidence votes, though under such circumstances the Liberals would no longer require the Speaker to break a tie in their favour, something which the speaker would not do on all matters of confidence, such a third reading on a budget bill.
  • June 4 - Former Premier of Quebec Bernard Landry announces his surprise resignation as leader of the Parti Québécois after receiving 76% support from a leadership review at the party's convention. Speculation immediately mounts that Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe will resign from federal politics and run to replace him.
  • June 6 - Ontario MP Pat O'Brien leaves the Liberal Party to sit as an independent, citing his dissapointment with Paul Martin not keeping his promise to hold cross country hearings on same-sex marriage. Mr. O'Brien has promised to do everything in his power to defeat Bill C-38 (presumably including a vote of no-confidence with the government).
  • June 9 - The Supreme Court of Canada strikes down a law in Quebec banning private health care.
File:Gurmantgrewal.JPG
Gurmant Grewal
  • June 10 - An audio engineer hired by the Conservative Party states that he can find no alterations in the final released version of the Gurmant Grewal tapes. This audio engineer is the only one to have actually examined the original tapes. There had been earlier evidence that Grewal may have altered the tapes but this analysis was done on exerpts of the tapes, not the complete product.
  • June 13 - Gilles Duceppe announces he will not run in the PQ leadership race but will instead lead the Bloc through the next federal election.
  • June 23
  • The House of Commons passes a motion to extend the sitting of parliament indefinately until such time as Bill C-38 (same-sex marriage) and Bill C-48 (Budget companion bill to implement agreement with the NDP) are passed.
  • In the late evening, shortly after third reading debate begins on Bill C-48, the Liberals introduce a closure motion supported by all parties but the Conservatives leading to a vote on C-48 which sees it pass by a margin of 152-147. This is seen as a reaction to the plan by Conservatives to bring down the government over C-48 the following week. As a result, the extended session of parliament will only have to deal with C-38.
David Wilkins
File:John gomery.jpg
Justice John Gomery
  • November 1 - Justice John Gomery releases the first report of the Gomery Commission into the sponsorship scandal. He finds several Liberal party organizers and Quebec advertising executives to be at fault for defrauding the program, but finds no evidence of elected officials being aware of or directing the fraud. Somewhat controversially, Gomery concludes that former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien holds ultimate responsibility for the program, as it occured under his watch, but exonerates then-finance minister Martin. Martin announces he accepts the findings unconditionally, and refers the report to the RCMP for possible further investigation. In a news conference later that day, Chrétien vows to challenge the report's findings through the courts, alleging bias on Gomery's part.
  • November 3 - The first poll is released following Gomery's findings, showing Liberal support dropping about 10%. Speculation mounts such numbers may motivate the opposition to move to prompt an election sooner rather than later.
  • November 9:
    • Layton announces that, in order to avoid an election of the Christmas holidays and to avoid the cancellation of the First Ministers' Meeting on Aboriginal issues, he will use his opposition day motion on November 24 to propose that an election be called in early January with a vote in mid-February. Such a motion would not be binding on the government and could not guarantee the election timing contained in its language.
    • Bloc MP Stéphane Bergeron (Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC) resigns from the house to run as a Parti Québécois candidate in a coming provincial byelection.
  • November 13 - Harper, Duceppe and Layton meet after Martin says he would not honour Layton's motion calling for an election campaign beginning in January. They propose that they will move forward with the NDP motion but, unless the Prime Minister commits to honouring it, they will vote no confidence in the government forcing an election call sometime in November.
  • November 14 - Finance Minister Goodale tables his fiscal update, which included a major tax cut package. The opposition demeans it as an attempt to buy votes.
  • November 21 - The NDP's motion to order Martin to call an election passes with a vote of 167-129.
  • November 24 - Stephen Harper introduces a motion of no confidence, seconded by Jack Layton. The vote was deferred until November 28.
Preceded by
2004 federal election
Canadian federal elections Succeeded by
40th federal election

External links

General links

Parties

Categories: