| Revision as of 00:10, 29 November 2005 editSplash (talk | contribs)33,425 edits →Judeofascism (term): rm massive amount of text that belongs anywhere else← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:06, 29 November 2005 edit undoCryptic (talk | contribs)Administrators41,596 editsm archived properlyNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
| == Votes == | == Votes == | ||
Revision as of 04:06, 29 November 2005
Votes
I think somewhere at the top of the page we should describe standardized wording for votes, particularly given that the rather contradictory verbs endorse (the deletion) and oppose (the undeletion request) amount to the same thing. Perhaps stick with, undelete and keep deleted. Marskell 14:30, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
- There is already a yellow box describing precisely that. In the change to Deletion review, the notion of reviewing a not-delete debate was introduced, and the old wording doesn't really fit that. -Splash 04:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ah yes. To qualify then, we should follow the wording as presented. (And perhaps we should tidy the top of the page). Marskell 04:50, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Archived to history
(i.e. deleted)
If I trimmed any current threads, a firm spanking is always welcome. - brenneman 06:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC)