| Revision as of 13:56, 10 June 2009 editTransatracurium (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,209 edits →Some shameless thankspam!: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:12, 10 June 2009 edit undoChzz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users115,894 edits →frequency response function: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| {{User:Colds7ream/RfA}} | {{User:Colds7ream/RfA}} | ||
| == frequency response function == | |||
| Hiya, | |||
| I've processed ]; I've marked it as declined, but see my reasoning in the box. I've also explained that to the user in ]. Hopefully I've done a good thing and I'm not treading on your toes? Cheers, <small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">]]</span></small> 15:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:12, 10 June 2009
-Fastily
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
Archive 1: Jan 2008 |
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, Mifter (talk) |
Mifter (talk) 23:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of SMX (computer language)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article SMX (computer language), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- No sources given to establish notability.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Cybercobra (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Your note
Thanks, I normally do, but I had a kitten in my left arm and was having problems typing. :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Some shameless thankspam!
frequency response function
Hiya,
I've processed Misplaced Pages:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: frequency response function; I've marked it as declined, but see my reasoning in the box. I've also explained that to the user in User talk:62.147.36.43#frequency response function. Hopefully I've done a good thing and I'm not treading on your toes? Cheers, Chzz ► 15:12, 10 June 2009 (UTC)