Misplaced Pages

Talk:Al Gore III: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:48, 11 June 2009 editTarc (talk | contribs)24,217 edits →Don't delete this← Previous edit Revision as of 04:09, 11 June 2009 edit undoGrundle2600 (talk | contribs)10,752 edits →Don't delete thisNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
:I Agree. Is notable, and verifiability criterion is met, as is shown by references. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) :I Agree. Is notable, and verifiability criterion is met, as is shown by references. ]<sup>]</sup> 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
:You should know by now that the way to go about this is to work on it in your own userspace, and then solicit outside opinion as to whether or not the article merits recreation. Simply recreating an extremely contentious BLP article is perhaps the worst way to go about this. ] (]) 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC) :You should know by now that the way to go about this is to work on it in your own userspace, and then solicit outside opinion as to whether or not the article merits recreation. Simply recreating an extremely contentious BLP article is perhaps the worst way to go about this. ] (]) 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
::The ONLY reason anyone ever wanted to delete it was because of the drug stuff, and that's censorship. No one ever said the subject wasn't notable until AFTER the drug stuff was added. The reason reason for deletion never had anything to do with notability, which is why the articles on both of Gore's daughters have never been deleted. It's because of the drug stuff - that's the ONLY difference between this article and those other two. ] (]) 04:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:09, 11 June 2009

WikiProject iconBiography Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

Don't delete this

No one ever wanted to delete the original article until after the stuff about his illegal drug use was added. So the reason it was deleted was an attempt at censorship. The deletion had nothing to do with any lack of notability, because no one wanted to delete it until after the drug stuff was added. Grundle2600 (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I Agree. Is notable, and verifiability criterion is met, as is shown by references. Danski14 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You should know by now that the way to go about this is to work on it in your own userspace, and then solicit outside opinion as to whether or not the article merits recreation. Simply recreating an extremely contentious BLP article is perhaps the worst way to go about this. Tarc (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
The ONLY reason anyone ever wanted to delete it was because of the drug stuff, and that's censorship. No one ever said the subject wasn't notable until AFTER the drug stuff was added. The reason reason for deletion never had anything to do with notability, which is why the articles on both of Gore's daughters have never been deleted. It's because of the drug stuff - that's the ONLY difference between this article and those other two. Grundle2600 (talk) 04:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Category: