Misplaced Pages

User talk:UzEE/Archives/2009/June: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:UzEE Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:56, 15 June 2009 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,871 editsm Archiving 2 discussions from User talk:UzEE. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 00:00, 16 June 2009 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,372,871 editsm Archiving 1 discussion from User talk:UzEE. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 228: Line 228:


For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 15:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on ]. Thank you for your cooperation. --] (]) 15:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
== Dear Mentor, ==

Thank you for your advice. We're putting it to good use.

I've run into a situation, and need your valuable insight.

One thing I've tried to do with respect to the outlines is place a hatnote on subject articles leading to that subject's corresponding outline.

Two people complained, and form the basis of consensus not to do it.

The main concern was quality: a hatnote shouldn't be placed unless the outline is of at least the same or higher quality than the article the hatnote is being placed on. That sets up a catch-22, since we need the best linking we can to attract readers and editors in the first place. The more traffic, the more feedback and changes.

So quality is the focus.

Please have a look at the outlines.

What are the biggest quality issues? What do the outlines need done to them in order to improve their quality?

I look forward to your reply on my talk page.

''''']''''' 22:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:00, 16 June 2009

This is an archive of past discussions with User:UzEE. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


In need of your mentorship

Hi,

I need help from an experienced Wikipedian, and I saw your name over at WP:ADOPT.

I need your advice concerning WP:WPOOK, which I've been coordinating. The set of pages the project concerns is listed at Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge and Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge#Projected outline, and has grown to about 500 articles in the encyclopedia.

The goals of the WikiProject are:

  1. Increase awareness of readers of the existence of the outlines on Misplaced Pages
  2. Complete the existing outlines
  3. Create an outline for every subject that is exensive enough to benefit from having an outline (core subjects and major or extensive fields). There are thousands of these.
  4. Recruit as many editors to work on these as possible (we need thousands of editors working on these)
  5. Surpass portals in number by the end of the summer, and leave them in the dust by the end of the year
  6. Get the major outline subject areas displayed on the Main Page (in place of or in addition to the portal links at the top of the page)
  7. Increase the OOK to higher quality than Britannica's Outline of Knowledge (published in its Propaedia volume).

I was hoping you could comment on how to achieve the goals above.

Also I'm interested in every possible way of reaching readers and editors of Misplaced Pages. How can I get the most eyes and typing fingers on Misplaced Pages's outlines? Contacting editors directly without a reason relevant to them is spam, which I'd like to avoid. There are 75,000 regular editors on Misplaced Pages, and I want to contact all of them. So how do I do it? Directly or indirectly, I don't care which, piecemeal or all-at-once, all methods are fine with me. But I've got to find ways. I need your help.

I would also like to know how to find or attract editors to create new outlines. And I need advice on finding editors to help write the new outline article mentioned above (it needs to be fleshed out, completely referenced, and brought to featured article status).

Can you recommend anyone in particular who might be interested in sinking their teeth into a project like this? Or ways to reach groups of editors? Or ways to reach all editors? I welcome any and all advice you might have.

I look forward to your reply on my talk page.

The Transhumanist    03:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

DB icon

Hello, I coverted the Db icon File:DBZ_UBX2.png to vector graphics. --> , giving advantages such as clearness; tell me what you think on my talk page before I convert the other ones and possibly make a big mistake :) Bugboy52.4 | =-= 03:39, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter
Issue XLIV - June 7, 2009

Issue XLIII | Issue XLV


Project in Review

As of June 2009:

Professional wrestling
articles
Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
FA 8 3 11
FL 17 20 37
GA 6 44 86 136
B 1 22 80 226 329
C 5 33 147 185
Start 2 54 260 1958 2274
Stub 21 467 488
List 4 31 642 1 678
Future 2 10 12
Assessed 3 91 496 3559 1 4150
Unassessed 1 1
Total 3 91 496 3559 2 4151

Changes to Featured and Good Content

Promoted Featured articles:

  • None

Promoted Featured lists:

Promoted Featured topics:

  • None

Reassessed Featured content:

  • None


Promoted Good articles:

  • None

Promoted Good topics:

  • None

Reassessed Good content:

  • None


Other Project News

—Articles

—Project


Events Calendar

This section is intended to warn users about potential targets of vandalism and speculation: professional wrestling events from major promotions for the month of June.



Recent Professional Wrestling News

Editing Tips

This is a section in the newsletter devoted to help familiarize project members with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.

  1. Our project has a cleanup listing. Please help by adding sources or expanding any articles listed here.
  2. Be aware of words to avoid. Certain words, if chosen poorly, can subtly promote a point of view.
  3. All Misplaced Pages articles should be written from a neutral point-of-view.

Contributors to this Issue
Project Navigation
PW Project main pages
PW Project Departments

Delivered: 14:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Re: DB Icon

I used Inkscape, mostly because its free though. I'm glad that ya like it :), if you want me to do more, just give me the word. Bugboy52.4 | =-= 14:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

do you want to give me a list of any specific ones, or every one on wikipedia. Bugboy52.4 | =-= 20:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I did the all of the other ones ones there (if you mean the ones in the userboxes). Bugboy52.4 | =-= 00:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:HTC Touch Pro2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HTC Touch Pro2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Misplaced Pages uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Misplaced Pages.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Dear Mentor,

Thank you for your advice. We're putting it to good use.

I've run into a situation, and need your valuable insight.

One thing I've tried to do with respect to the outlines is place a hatnote on subject articles leading to that subject's corresponding outline.

Two people complained, and form the basis of consensus not to do it.

The main concern was quality: a hatnote shouldn't be placed unless the outline is of at least the same or higher quality than the article the hatnote is being placed on. That sets up a catch-22, since we need the best linking we can to attract readers and editors in the first place. The more traffic, the more feedback and changes.

So quality is the focus.

Please have a look at the outlines.

What are the biggest quality issues? What do the outlines need done to them in order to improve their quality?

I look forward to your reply on my talk page.

The Transhumanist    22:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)