| Revision as of 02:54, 10 June 2009 edit194x144x90x118 (talk | contribs)561 edits →Scjesseys back at it: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:09, 18 June 2009 edit undo194x144x90x118 (talk | contribs)561 edits →Colloborate with me on the afd: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| As you can see Scjessey is back at it attempting to push through changes for the Dreamhost article that don't seem all that neutral. Do you think we might be able to convince this editor to respect neutrality by discussing this matter with him on his talkpage or do you have any suggestions regarding what we could possibly do about this?--] (]) 02:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | As you can see Scjessey is back at it attempting to push through changes for the Dreamhost article that don't seem all that neutral. Do you think we might be able to convince this editor to respect neutrality by discussing this matter with him on his talkpage or do you have any suggestions regarding what we could possibly do about this?--] (]) 02:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Colloborate with me on the afd == | |||
| Lets work out a good text to make the afd with, if we make the strongest possible AfD then it's more likely that the article will end.--] (]) 02:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:09, 18 June 2009
Scjesseys back at it
As you can see here Scjessey is back at it attempting to push through changes for the Dreamhost article that don't seem all that neutral. Do you think we might be able to convince this editor to respect neutrality by discussing this matter with him on his talkpage or do you have any suggestions regarding what we could possibly do about this?--194x144x90x118 (talk) 02:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Colloborate with me on the afd
Lets work out a good text to make the afd with, if we make the strongest possible AfD then it's more likely that the article will end.--194x144x90x118 (talk) 02:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)