| Revision as of 07:03, 18 June 2009 editPzrmd (talk | contribs)3,920 edits →Something interesting← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:50, 18 June 2009 edit undoVanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (talk | contribs)36,325 edits →Something interestingNext edit → | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| You may find interesting. Note how quickly it was archived without comment. ] (]) 00:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | You may find interesting. Note how quickly it was archived without comment. ] (]) 00:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :That's very bad] (]) 07:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | :That's very bad] (]) 07:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Responding== | |||
| You nominated an article on a notable political party for deletion, and then leapt around from defence to defence with any attempt to reason with you. I'm not sure if you're either trolling or you're a twit - I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and go with twit. ] (]) 13:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 18 June 2009
Template:Archive box collapsible
Estonia–Luxembourg relations
Hello, I've recently tried to restore this page to a version which can be improved upon (a non-protected, non-disambiguation page) and I wondered if I could get your opinion about whether it is currently up to the quality which we expect of every Misplaced Pages article. I would appreciate your comments on the article at User:Cdogsimmons/Estonia–Luxembourg relations on the talk page there, and further improvements that would get it closer to inclusion status are always welcome. Thanks.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Malta–Pakistan relations
I feel vindicated. Thank you. --BlueSquadronRaven 02:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Bilateral relations standstill
I intend to post this on AN later today (around 21:00 UTC). Please let me know if there is anything you would definitely object to or suggest changing. Stifle (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Images in bilateral relations articles
I keep on seeing these images being removed in my various editing tools, and Denmark–Mexico relations was just the latest. I do understand your position on the subject, but I think that we need to seek broader input to see if there is consensus on removal of such images from these articles. As it stands I don't see any consensus that they should be removed, and there is more than enough here to argue about. May I suggest that the status quo on these images be maintained until we have agreement on a change of direction based on community consensus. Alansohn (talk) 05:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism - User:Wizardawp
Please note: Minoan civilization. I just reverted a vandalism edit by User:Wizardawp. As you gave him a "last warning".............Best Wishes. WBardwin (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You & WP:AN
I mentioned you here on WP:AN. I hope you don't mind. -- llywrch (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Copyright's and such
I don't know if you know about this stuff, but do you think there is anything wrong with how Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) often quotes all or most of the free preview of the articles he cites from paysites like newsbank.com? See for example, Czech_Republic_–_Iceland_relations#References. I'd take it up with him directly, but I'm unclear on the rules here, and so I think it'd be very counter productive to be like, "Oh hey I think maybe you're violating copyright law here....Oh wait, just kidding..." You know what I'm saying? If you or someone else thinks this practice is a problem, I'd be happy to mention it to him. Yilloslime C 05:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
Greetings
Thanks for your note on my talk page. I'm done here. Won't be logging on again. Just aint the place for me. Go well (bali).96.57.32.235 (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Regarding canvassing...
...please note that I believe that editor has left Misplaced Pages per his last two edits being blanking of his user pages. Sincerely, --A Nobody 18:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion
I'd suggest that you stop engaging with the other editor, and if you see vandalism, personal attacks or other negative behaviors, then bring it to an administrator, the anti-vandalism notice board or the administrator's noticeboard. Dreadstar † 03:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
Responses from 98.154.26.247
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I also replied on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of diplomatic missions of South Ossetia about the keep word you crossed out.
Something interesting
You may find this interesting. Note how quickly it was archived without comment. Drawn Some (talk) 00:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's very badPzrmd (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Responding
You nominated an article on a notable political party for deletion, and then leapt around from defence to defence with any attempt to reason with you. I'm not sure if you're either trolling or you're a twit - I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and go with twit. Rebecca (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)